Monday, October 02, 2006


The CIA murdered the greatest leader of modern Islam and the Middle East, Faisal ibn Abdul Aziz Al Saud [King Faisal], in March 1975.

'They' [probably including Richard Helms who was in Tehran 1973 to 1976 as a precursor] then had rebels seize the Grand Mosque in Mecca - the bin Laden family was allegedly in on that plot - and killed the Transformer which had been there since the 1920s during the takeover/recovery of the Mosque in November 1979.

The CIA then transferred the 'heavenly mandate' of the Saudi government to the Taliban. That process began with resistance to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979; one aspect of which was documented in a photo with Reagan [transfer of the ideological leadership or 'soft mandate'], but another aspect of which involved Commander Durand on the ground [the physical component/alien interface backing ideological leadership we could call the 'hard mandate'].

In January 2004 our government tried to murder Navy SEAL Commander James Durand in Iraq, and I am pretty sure he either is the highest ranking or one of the highest ranking service members killed or wounded over there. By mistake they only blew his legs off approximately from the knees down; Durand's specialty was nuclear warheads; only three other SEALs had the same specialty and they are all now dead. McChrystal wants 40,000 troops now but that is furthering decisions we made in and prior to 1979. Soon after the attack on Durand I read about the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) developing 'men who have three arms' for fighting in caves in Afghanistan and the larger region and suspect that is peripheral to the physical component/alien interface we gave the Taliban.
Longtime readers may remember my writing about Bryan Adrian, child of a pilot pretty clearly associated with the CIA, 'blacklisted' in Washington D.C. in 2006.
Adrian denied being CIA himself and on that basis I let him sleep on my apartment floor when he was homeless which I came to regret - he 'anticipated' the 'illegal Mexican-home purchases-element' of the mortgage crisis leading to the current recession/ depression [he probably lied to me]; anyway, Adrian now anticipates a new and tougher breed of aliens arriving through some emergent condition in the space/time continuity of our galaxy. He suggests they are known to have an opportunity to come and they will be coming; I suspect we knew that and wanted them to get with the Taliban rather than Faisal, and again point to the DARPA effort to develop men with three arms for fighting or I guess more generally 'extra limb capacity' whether or not they anticipate cave fighting and deployment to Afghanistan or the region.

Navy SEAL Commander James Durand was recently called back to head a group in Sitka, Alaska, as a civilian. Having agreed to take the assignment, Durand got knocked out of the slot by a significantly elevated potassium level discovered at the VA when his physical condition abruptly deteriorated. Of course it is possible the 'potassium issue' was not induced and is not a third attempt to take him out though it happened in parallel to the McChrystal request [they made him live on the streets as a cripple for a couple years which I think was part of a second effort though they did not decisively follow up on that].

At least it should be noted that the previous humanoid-lizard paradigm, with or without 'hollow Earth' theory implications, may have understated the anticipated situation, in general and specifically related to Afghanistan and the region.

Taking out Burns was misguided, and it hasn't helped further their agenda beyond that Obama now goes to speaking engagements across the region. 'Obama brings case to Montana; President tries to counter critics on fight over health care', Mike Dennison, 'Billings Gazette' 15 Aug 2009.... with a note attached to the copy I saw in Washington D.C. to the effect the president refused to answer questions on
1. "financing/self financing from theft of organs," and
2. "what he [has done] so far with thousands of victims in illegal NASA custody including youth."

I would be astonished to hear Obama actually was asked those questions in Montana - and somewhat gratified, hoping that in some small way Conradburned helped advance the fight. Enhancing the second query, NASA certainly has other things it should be doing: 'NASA's Trajectory Unrealistic, Panel Says', Joel Achenbach, 'Washington Post' 14 Aug 2009.... The current NASA plan makes a moon landing in 2020 possible under the budget only if the agency de-orbits the international space station - crashing it into the South Pacific - in 2016.... [in other words, the question wasn't strictly speaking just about the "victims of illegal NASA custody" but additionally suggested NASA either sucks at what they're really suppose to be doing or has so dramatically advanced into lying, disinformation, and treason that nobody over there should be getting government checks or pensions], and

'NASA's future turns bleaker', Mark K. Matthews and Robert Block, Orlando Sentinel, 15 Aug 2009.... Obama's aides said privately they were hoping the group would recommend scrapping NASA's troubled Ares I rocket program and finding another, cheaper way to get humans back to the moon.... [with the story continuing on in the general deception routine so typical of government]. Swine.

Folksy and down-to-earth maybe, there is still something to be said for politicians who are shamed by the magnitude of those lies. Is the CIA attack designator continuing in Montana - for once I am not certain. It definitely is in the volunteers searching for the lost kid and recent activity/media coverage of the curve on Rt 72, but here is a more subtle one. 'Bark beetle epidemic reshapes debate on logging', Jennifer McKee, 'Billings Gazette', 17 Aug 2009 is very proximate to pervasive emerald ash borer attacks; see also 'Have you seen this killer? Bug patrol guards against foreign invaders', Joel Banner Baird, 'Burlington Free Press', 13 Aug 2009 on the Asian Longhorned Beetle. A couple particular recent attacks on the east coast which resulted in mass tree cutting almost certainly were CIA-orchestrated, and a big tree got taken down on the grounds of the Barnum School in Bridgeport with M. Jodi Rell leading the CIA effort there [I do not like Rell and would not vote for her to be dog catcher, but she is quite frankly ten times the candidate Sarah Palin ever was and isn't significantly more associated with the CIA than Palin who I suspect is herself a brain wash victim].

The previous 'mountaintop removal' attack on Kentucky and West Virginia is entering a new phase [The Plan: Plant 1.25 million trees; Group wants to reforest E. Kentucky mining sites; Bill Estep, Herald-Leader, 16 Aug 2009 to the tune of $422 million of your federal tax dollars noting it isn't clear why they didn't make the mining companies reforest when they were done as part of the deal to begin with], so while other signs are up and proximate activities are underway elsewhere, at the end of the day I can't say with certainty the bark beetle epidemic in Montana is CIA instigated or not. Ask Jon Tester and tell him you don't want the usual line of bull****; then tell him you don't really care about searching for the kid on a pleasant afternoon but not to authorize anymore environmental manipulation either using radiation from remote locations or insects.

Whining bitch. Sanford caught cheating on his wife over Father's Day with some broad in Argentina, and guys like this are suppose to be the future of the GOP while guys like Burns who hunt deer and are moderate get shunned. In front of you at the office every day with maybe overtime and shared 'ups and downs' thrown in I can see how temptation could get to be a real problem, but when the woman lives in Argentina maybe you just need to grow up a little bit. Specter from Pennsylvania walked on the party, and while I don't think Burns would have walked I also don't suppose he blames Arlen for doing it.

After years of suffering from 'the attack dogs' of orchestrated government PERSECUTION and media collaboration in a sinister, unnecessary, even 'idiotic' plot to take down the Republicans and throw control of Congress to the Democrats as part of some Council on Foreign Relations slash Zionist 'World Realignment,'

with Conrad Burns as the primary target - at significant cost to his reputation, 'aging process' if not his immediate health, and retirement - but every citizen and taxpayer certainly victimized,

the government has announced they aren't going to prosecute HIM for the activities the CIA and their Zionist masters conceptualized, developed, planned, and executed on him.

Pictured is one of our Navy vessels in the Persian Gulf. You would like to think that you could safely support the United States Navy without question or controversy; that our government is simply right and the other fellow is simply wrong.

Unfortunately, as we have so clearly seen in 'conrad burned,' that is not at all the case.

In the summer of 2006, the Israelis cut a deal with Iran significantly expanding Hezbollah in Lebanon, ultimately restoring the dominance of the Caliphate in that country at the expense of the Lebanese Christian minority.

Bush then tried to get our military to nuke Iran in late August 2007 [adjustable yield warheads on missiles, perhaps with explosions as small as five kilotons or barely nuking at all] apparently for more-or-less the same reason. Failing that - our military didn't do it - the odds are pretty good either the Israelis used their contacts in Iran to ignite an immediate tactical challenge to our Navy, or the Council on Foreign Relations is setting up a battle sequence designed to ultimately unify or stabilize radical [maybe ethnic] elements in Iran and even Pakistan versus the rest of the Arab world.

It's also possible Bush utilized Navy elements sympathetic to his earlier 'nuclear strike' ambitions to position ships in places or patterns which supplemented or enabled the Israeli or Council on Foreign Relations activity to unfold. Obviously the Israeli plan to have our Navy engage the Iranians wouldn't work if our Navy wasn't there.

The Vincennes taking down Iranian Air Flt 655 was almost certainly staged.

Hopefully our Navy guys are smart enough to see what is going on - as they did last summer when Bush tried to nuke Iran - and they won't rise to the bait. Our Office of Naval Intelligence had ties to the Shah's navy years ago and its even possible fairly direct ties of some kind still exist and can be worked to get us across this period of transition; the important thing is forcing Bush out of office. NOW. Immediately. Getting rid of the guy. Senator Burns - 'conradburned' - may [or may not] talk patriotic, but he knows there are serious problems in the administration and we are not in any position to engage new enemies or more countries.

We have tried to take a broad approach - 'painting the big picture' - in construction of this blogspot. Is it timely? Now more than ever. Founder Scientologist L. Ron Hubbard and the late Senate leader turned Ambassador Mike Mansfield came out of Montana in roughly the same era - Hubbard maybe half a step behind - and now Mansfield protege Joe Biden from Delaware is trying to help Obama bring the ship through the literally murderous storm. The attack on Ted Stevens, the attack on Larry Craig, in all probability the death Craig Thomas, the 'one hell of a coincidence' or death of Anne Pressly - can be best viewed and understood in light of the attack on Conrad Burns. Background and today; hopefully you'll find this interesting and in some small way a tribute to the men and women who have tried to channel our nation's energies in more positive directions - and suffered for it.

They say the family was Greek in Constantinople, and picked up the name 'Zaharoff' when they had to flee a pogrom in the 1820s. All we know for sure is that he - Basil - had a nasty reek of Zionist CIA Council on Foreign Relations affiliation a hundred years later. To wit:

Gallipoli is - or was - exactly parallel to the arrest and slaughter of Armenians in Turkey, and I increasingly suspect that was not coincidental.

Certainly Darfur and Kosovo, but really going back through the Khmer Rouge to even the traditional 'Holocaust' of WWII and Stalin's forced starvation in the Ukraine - can't get around ethnic cleansing as a 'Council on Foreign Relations-favored tool' for national restructuring.

For the sake of the argument, can we 'name names' or identify people who were in on it in Turkey?

Alexander Helphand-Parvus: Russian Revolutionary and German Patriot,
Heinz Schurer, The Russian Review.
page 310. [In 1910 he] "settled in Constantinople to carry on his work as a journalist there.
320. "In August, 1914, a new Parvus was born. The old Russian revolutionary emerged as one of the most active protagonists of the German cause in Turkey.... He was unique in being the one Russian socialist to take his stand as a German patriot."
321. Parvus is known to have visited Romania and Bulgaria in January 1915.
"Owing to Parvus' intervention, German subsidies appear to have reached the Romanian Socialists in 1915 and 1916, in all likelihood by devious means."

322. Parvus is known to have met Lenin in Switzerland in May or June 1915. "By this time, Parvus had elaborated his master plan" which everybody recognizes included sending Lenin back to Russia.
In fact that 'master plan' also came to include an effort to gimp the French by getting them to undertake a mass suicide attack [which they did: the Nivelle Offensive 16 Apr to 09 May 1917 followed by mutiny in the French army 29 Apr to 20 May when Nivelle was sacked] in return for the Zimmermann Telegram and a chance for the Germans [Zimmermann] to negotiate via the Vatican which ultimately came to naught but 'they' - the French and the Germans - thought it might end the war.

It DID end the war by pulling the Americans in, and the Jews got the Balfour Declaration in November 1917 as a reward for pulling that off which gets into the origin of the German 'betrayal' allegation;

anyway, or maybe 'in light of that known negotiation process,'

knowing the Parvus 'master plan' had BOTH Eastern Front and Western Front components,

I ask whether the Armenian genocide was a precursor. Did Parvus previously unify German and British positions on resolution of the Ottoman question, potentially as a mandated requirement by one or the other before they would consent to sending Lenin back to Russia,

which does appear to have been a joint decision?

If so - if the German 'spy' [or agent] Parvus did work with the British, can we say exactly who? [Remember, we know Parvus sold the plan to the Germans and got money for Lenin et al].

Basil Zaharoff: Munitions King, Richard Lewinsohn, P. Lippincott Co., London 1934.
Page 101. Zaharoff had long since been something more than an agent, and through his holding of shares had already acquired an important voice in the firm, when the English house of Vickers approached Maxim with an offer of amalgamation....
102. And the amount to be paid for taking over Maxim Works was more than L 1,000,000. Neither Maxim nor Zaharoff could resist this offer. In the year 1897 the Maxim Guns and Ammunition Company was transferred to Vickers for the sum of L 1,353,334 Sterling. The London banker, Ernest Cassel, an intimate friend of the future King Edward VII, helped to finance the scheme...

121. When Albert Vickers retired from the Board of the French company "Le Nickel" in the spring of 1913, he was succeeded by Zaharoff... [who] sat next to the representatives of the House of Rothschild.
122. Zaharoff provided the money to found a Chair of Aviation at the Sorbonne.

123. [O]n July 31st, 1914, the very day on which Jean Jaures fell as the first victim of the war frenzy in Paris - it was announced in the Journal Officiel that Zaharoff had been appointed Commander of the Legion of Honor by decree of the President of the Republic. The reason given was simple and pregnant - 'services exceptionnels'; and the proposal had come from the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

There is no grainy black and white video of Zaharoff dealing Armenian death to an interim Turkish government; what we have is Zaharoff going into the ultimate Council on Foreign Relations fixer paradigm with a number of opportunities in betrayal along the way.

Switching to Wikipedia, CIA on the Internet, for a moment:

"In the years that follow[ed World war I], Zaharoff involved himself in the affairs of the lesser powers... In particular, he set out to ensure that Greece and [his friend, Greek politician and leader] Venizelos received a proper share of spoils from a badly weakened Turkey [OR ANYWAY THIS IS THE STORY]. Zaharoff convinced Venizelos to attack but, after some impressive initial success, the Greek army was eventually driven back. In the election that followed, Constantine's loyalists managed to force Venizelos to flee, but Zaharoff stayed around and persuaded the same king that he had to attack Turkey again [ALMOST CERTAINLY A COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS MANDATE][.][ ] With Ataturk now in charge of Turkey, this venture was bound to fail..."
[end citation]

That 'second' effort or postwar attack sequence justified Turkish elimination of
their long resident Greek minority, most famously at Smyrna where they broke the legs of the donkeys on the quay and drowned them in shallow water.

Zaharoff prompting that SECOND effort - the attacks on the Greek minority, or the SECOND ethnic cleansing obviously doesn't prove Zaharoff was in on the first effort which was the attack on the Armenians, but boy it is a heck of a suggestion.

Zaharoff founded his own bank [Banque de la Seine] with which to advance his own interests in the Balkans, and it apparently served as a vehicle taking him into an even broader arena though I don't think the bank itself ultimately did very well.

Back to Basil Zaharoff: Munitions King.
190. Zaharoff entered the field of oil politics. His interests were closely allied with those of the British Government.
192. The peculiar international position that Zaharoff had acquired afforded him the opportunity of performing the most valuable pioneer services for British oil interests... [including with] the enterprising French Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas [which is ultimate Council on Foreign Relations, Lyndon LaRouche signed, sealed, and delivered].

Two 'larger' points:
Postwar Zaharoff was getting into 'oil politics' for the British in Europe and with the French in Algiers as St. John Philby [Kim Philby's father, see Treason in the Blood, Anthony Cave Brown, I think 1996] was conceptually 'betraying' British interests in Saudi Arabia and setting up the American growth economy of the 20th Century [also apparently on behalf of the Council on Foreign Relations]

- Council on Foreign Relations did a makeup -

and Aristotle Onassis came out of Smyrna as they were breaking the legs of the donkeys. Pretty coincidental that he went into oil with Zaharoff already there.

Anyway, that is Unified Holocaust Theory including Gallipoli and the Armenian Genocide in addition to the postwar slaughter of the Greeks in Turkey, all as Council on Foreign Relations manipulation.

Which brings us into the 'betrayal sequence' of late 1916 and 1917 which, interestingly enough, employed many of the same players. To the point at which one can reasonably ask if the Armenian genocide was a necessary precursor step, and speculate about how INFORMATION FLOWED in both directions across the human-alien interface.

Detailed further down in this blogspot, I recapture some of the highlights here:

Parvus moved to Istanbul and lived there five years 1910-1915, setting up an arms trading company and ultimately getting close to 'the Young Turks' who were taking power at the end of the Ottoman Empire [Mehmed Talat Pasha, Ismail Enver, and Ahmed Djmal]. Those guys handled the dirty work of killing the Armenians, and then were promptly killed to cover the backtrail leading to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Evidently Zaharoff was able to utilize Parvus [tied at least through Vickers] as a mechanism for working forward after the British and Germans reached some agreement on what the post-Ottoman government would look like. Of course there are further ramifications; why didn't the Turks simply deport the Armenians to Armenia?
EITHER because the British and the Germans knew Russia was going to be weak [that the Jewish government taking over Russia would be weak], and they wanted to keep the border states weak [for example],
OR because they cut an explicit deal for slaughter at the human-alien interface. They agreed to feed the plasma structure and whatever other 'balancing' mechanisms there may be.

In Turkey, Parvus was close to German ambassador Baron Hans Freiherr von Wangenheim. It is also clear that Parvus offered a 'master plan' for ending the war to the German general staff. The emergent question is whether the Zionist British led him to that, essentially after establishing their credibility with the Armenian Genocide.

‘THE PLAN’ Parvus brought in 1915 IS WIDELY ACKNOWLEDGED to have included paralyzing Russia via a general strike financed by the German government, and the return of Lenin to Russia, with the ultimate goal of creating a Jewish-backed overthrow of the government [which happened].

Two years later ‘The Plan’ included the effective capitulation of France and more speculatively their English allies in returning to the prewar status quo, following a fairly tight sequence of events starting with the Zimmermann Telegram announcing unrestricted submarine warfare and potential trouble with Mexico and a mutiny of the French army following the intentionally disastrous ‘Nivelle Offensive’ and battles of Aisne II and Champagne III in March/April/May 1917.

Parvus specialized in - and had significant credentials - on the Russian side.

We do not at this time know with certainty if one or more other people [Jews] came to be involved in ‘The Plan’ as it finally emerged on the European side but suspect there were additional elements given the mutiny among the French for example, the Balfour Declaration of the following November by which time it was clear the Allies would be victorious, and the ultimate German reaction which certainly included vilifying the Jews and slaughtering them during the Second World War.

Zaharoff is standing there, but even behind him there was a structure that he dealt into and concealed [in arranging the post-war Turkish attack on Greeks in Turkey], going on to take care of him in 'oil politics' for example.

Anyway, all parties evidently thought they had a deal to end the war.

Zimmermann sent the famous telegram in January 1917. In sequence, late Spring 1917:
A. March 15 Tsar Nicholas II abdicates.
B. March 20 Woodrow Wilson's cabinet votes to declare war on Germany.
C. April 02 Wilson delivers war address to Congress.
D. April 06 US declares war on Germany.
E. April 16-May 09 Nivelle Offensive [Second Battle of Aisne, Third Battle of Champagne] ending in French failure.
F. April 09 Canadian success at Battle of Vimy Ridge.
G. April 29 - May 20 Mutiny breaks out in French army.
H. Beginning May 12 and continuing, fighting resumes on the Italian front - the [ongoing] Battles of Isonzo, ending in Italian failure.

From Wikipedia [Nivelle Offensive]. When Robert Nivelle took over from Joseph Joffre as French Commander-in-Chief in December 1916, he argued that a massive onslaught on German lines would bring French victory in 48 hours. The plan was put into action on 16 April 1917 after support from France's Prime Minister, despite strong disapproval from other high-ranking officials.

The Nivelle offensive was a huge and costly undertaking, involving around 1.2 million troops and 7,000 artillery pieces on a broad front between Royle and Reims. Its main focus was a massive assault on the German positions along the Aisne river, in the Second Battle of the Aisne. From the start the plan, which had been in development since December 1916, was plagued by delays and information leaks. By the time it went into action in April 1917, the plans were well known to the German army, who took appropriate defensive measures as a result.

The offensive achieved very little in the way of territorial gain, nowhere near the 48-hour breakthrough envisaged. In the aftermath of its end on 9 May 1917, Nivelle was sacked, ending his career. There were over 187,000 French casualties alone, sparking widespread mutiny in the French army, including one famous incident where as the offensive was winding down the French 2nd division arrived on the battlefield, drunk and without guns....[end citation].

That human sacrifice may represent the outcome of negotiations at the human-alien interface and an effort to close the war on 'an up note' so to speak. After all, at least conceptually they didn't know it wouldn't work. The war might have ended there in 1917. Of course it didn't, but knowing the Germans under the Nazi government assumed a relatively important if not 'pivotal' position at the human-alien interface, you have to guess it started somewhere and participation in the sequence almost certainly brought them long-term credibility. Here is where the Zionists and the British THOUGHT they had a win. They THOUGHT they were clever, but as Rowan Williams takes down England the results are really quite ambiguous.

Revised Standard Edition of pre-World War II 20th Century European History.

Your awareness is very much appreciated.

Andrew Bestor, January~February 2007. The larger point here is that this is background to the attacks on the United States and our political process which ultimately took down Conrad Burns.

F***ing J*ws - or whoever screws with me as I try to update this blogspot.
They're still after Conrad - at least just enough so they can kiss him now and then.

conradburned - for troverburned. In a blatant case of CIA arson on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C., which was done as part of their high density traffic 'blockage and delay' overview designator. That category of activity which includes truckers laying their rigs down on highways in a fog or California, or wrecks outside cities at multiple locations usually at rush hour - typically used to lock you in your commute home but this time in the a.m. [08 August 2007].

...Fire officials on the scene this morning said they received a call about a fire in a dumpster the back of a building in the 200 block of Pennsylvania Avenue SE at around 5:15 a.m. The call was upgraded to a two-alarm fire within a half-hour.

Fire Marshal Gary Palmer said the cause of the blaze is still under investigation. Response to the blaze closed Pennsylvania Avenue from Independence Avenue to 4th Street SE. By 9 a.m., part of the road had been reopened, although the 200 block remains closed...
[citing to Greg Barber, Express 08 Aug 2007 incl photo]. It actually looks like they took the call and then had to wait on the fire to grow. Jesus wept.

Well, now we know who did it.
We always knew the CIA did it [and the Fire Department was apparently in on it, but that's not as bad as them being in on the 'pedestrian accident' which happened just down the street from that at North Carolina and Penn SE in roughly the same time period].
This is beyond that.

"Future Home of the Heritage Foundation, House Annex." 227 Penn Ave. SE, Washington D.C.

True. It looks to have been done for them. Tenent lined up, renovation began. Be sure to write "Swine" on the outside of the envelope. No spell check available; thanks for your awareness.

Hillary trying to assume legitimacy with law enforcement people behind her, but she has a nasty CIA affiliation and its possible the New Hampshire incident [guy allegedly threatening an office] was staged. Certainly the law enforcement issue is problematic; I think she uses the double[s] claiming law enforcement isn't good enough for her [in fact its because she's a lousy campaigner and the double is better]. Here she seeks virtue.

Not good. Democrats should vote for somebody else.

Hillary let Bill Richardson put an 'advanced' CIA technology in my body, skull and brain as an aspect of crushing emergent coalition government in Japan circa 1993-4 and then 1994-5; that is the sum of her experience. CIA activity. He's in it and so is she.

In retreat [she will try to duck the CIA affiliation] Hillary will try to claim the economic legacy of her husband's administration, but she worked at Wal-MART developing the Chinese trade paradigm which has hollowed out our economy. Bush was the guy who trashed NAFTA in throwing the door open to the Asians, but Hillary Clinton was the one who crafted all the highly detailed little dance steps in advance which got us there. She knew before hand what was going to happen; illegal immigrants to the drug trafficking.

Bush tried to get the military to nuke Iran [true], apparently in late August when the B-52 had the cruise missiles mounted on it at Minot, then flying to Barksdale.

Hillary Clinton ALREADY knew that when she voted to declare the Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. YES. She already knew.

Rumor has it Herman Goering is in the House of Representatives, but this is the 'Hitler's daughter' paradigm; she's here and she's in politics. The video.

The book. Hitler's Daughter...Wants to Occupy the White House, Timothy Benford, 2000. Well, if Hillary Clinton is really Hitler's daughter [and indicators suggest she might be], she already has.

It hardly stops there, though. How many daughters can Hitler possibly have?

[F]rom David Meyer's August 2007 Last Trumpet Newsletter:
Angela Merkel was born in the D.D.R., the Communist portion of Germany in 1954. Her biography says she was born on July 17, 1954, and that she is the daughter of a Lutheran minister from an East German-controlled church. Recently, however, Soviet KGB archive files reveal an entirely different story. Stasi GDR files indicate that she was born on April 20th, 1954, and details of her birth were included in the records of the German Dr. Karl Klauberg, who was one of the Nazi "death doctors" convicted by Soviet courts and imprisoned. When he later was recognized as a brilliant scientist, he was released after seven years and was recognized as the father of artificial insemination. The Soviets were even more intrigued when they discovered Dr. Klauberg had preserved frozen samples of the sperm of Adolf Hitler. The forces of darkness in high places decided to try to produce a child from Hitler's sperm, obviously for occult and illuministic purposes. Dr. Klauberg then brought the youngest sister of Eva Braun (Hitler's wife), whose name was Gretl, to Eastern Germany, and the result of the experiment produced not a biological son of Hitler, but rather a daughter. Amazingly, Adolf Hitler was born on April 20th, 1889, and Angela Merkel was born on April 20th, 1954. (April 20th is 11 days before the witches' high sabat of Beltaine.) Angela became a custodian of the Catholic Church through its connections with the East German Lutheran Church. Once a German Pope would take the Roman throne, Angela Merkel was to also take her biological father's position as German Chancellor. On April 20th, 2005, the Nazi Joseph Ratzinger became Pope Benedict XVI, (16th), precisely on the 116th birthday of Adolf Hitler. Then on November 22nd, 2005, Hitler's biological daughter, Angela Merkel was elected Chancellor of Germany. The day of that election, November 22nd, was the anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's Origin of the Species, which is an antichrist publication denying the Creator of the universe.

If the Soviet record is true, and the evidence is strong, it opens up some amazing possibilities. The undeniable fact is that Angela Merkel came from obscurity to triumviral power as German Chancellor, President of the European Union, and head of the powerful G-8 economic cartel... Hitler's father, who took the name Hitler, was the illegitimate son of a Rothschild mistress whose last name was Schicklgruber. The etymology of the name Hitler reveals that the name means a shepherd who lives in a hut. The name Adolf from Old High German means noble wolf. Thus, his combined name indicates that he was the Shepherd Wolf, or false shepherd. Strangely enough, Pope Ratzinger, or Benedict XVI, also has the title of Shepherd of the Church, and since he took office, the Roman Catholic Church has had a German shepherd. Incidentally, that breed of dog resembles a wolf... Adolf Hitler nicknamed himself Herr Wolf. His East Prussian headquarters was called Wolfsschanze; his headquarters in France was called Wolfsschlucht, and his headquarters in the Ukraine was called Werwolf...

One more interesting point is that Chancellor Angela Merkel has an unusual obsession with the works of the occult composer Richard Wagner, who was a Satanist. She made her obsession known in an interview with the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung in July 2005. Wagner wrote the infamous composition called Parsifal, which is purely occult and demonic. Parsifal was a favorite of Adolf Hitler as well, and Hitler stated that the music of Wagner occupied his mind. Angela Merkel, like Adolf Hitler, is deeply fascinated with Wagner's Ride of the Valkyries. The valkyries were minor female deities that would ride through every battle to gather the most valiant of the slain and carry them off to a place called Valhalla where they would wait to join the army of Odin in the last battle at the end of the world... [end citation].

In short, we don't know - particularly insofar as we don't know when or where the sperm was allegedly captured - but its possible Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel could be half sisters via a petri dish.

Giuliani as the enabling device or 'CIA enforcer' in New York.

"In 1970, Giuliani joined the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York" [Wikipedia]. From there, things went south.

In 1973, [after Frank Lucas unified New York heroin dealing for the CIA in parallel to Frank Serpico similarly opening the door to CIA corruption of the police department, and David Harris finished with Joe Valachi in La Tuna] he [Giuliani] was named Chief of the Narcotics Unit and was eventually appointed United States Attorney. In 1975, Giuliani was recruited to Washington, D.C. during the Ford administration, where he was named Associate Deputy Attorney General and chief of staff to Deputy Attorney General Harold "Ace" Tyler. His first high-profile prosecution was of U.S. Representative Bertram L. Podell (NY-13), who was convicted of corruption. Wikipedia.

Wayne Barrett, Rudy!, 2000, suggested Giuliani's relationship with the Mafia "included his own family: His father and uncle had Mafia ties. Uncle Leo D'Avanzo ran a loan-sharking and gambling operation out of a Brooklyn bar, and used his father Harold as muscle to collect unpaid debts.

According to the book, the two were involved in a shootout with a member of the mob on a Brooklyn street in the early 1960s over a loan-sharking dispute. D'Avanzo was partnered with a made man, Jimmy Dano, in their illegal business. The book said Giuliani's cousin Lewis D'Avanzo was a mob associate who ran a major car theft ring. It also says the FBI suspected that D'Avanzo -- who went to school with Giuliani and attended the mayor's first wedding -- was involved in several murders. D'Avanzo was killed in Brooklyn by FBI agents in 1977 when he tried to run down an agent who had stopped him on a warrant for transporting 100 stolen luxury cars." Larry McShane, Associated Press, September 11, 2007.

The 1977 killing of D'Avanzo is hugely of interest in light of other CIA designators and Giuliani's subsequent career.

[Back to Wikipedia] In 1981, Giuliani was named Associate Attorney General in the Reagan administration, the third-highest position in the Department of Justice. As Associate Attorney General, Giuliani supervised the U.S. Attorney Offices' federal law enforcement agencies, the Department of Corrections, the Drug Enforcement Administration, and the United States Marshals Service...
In other words, before we talk about the cocaine wave subsequently engulfing the United States including via Arkansas under Bill and Hillary Clinton, we have to note Giuliani was the setup man, operating the key 'conceptual' Drug Enforcement [or enabling] mechanism.

How can Terry Reed blame Asa Hutchinson, at the time apparently the United States Attorney in Arkansas, when it was Rudy Giuliani telling Hutchinson what to do or establishing the framework in advance?

[More Wikipedia] In 1983, Giuliani was appointed U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. It was in this position that he first gained national prominence by prosecuting numerous high-profile cases, resulting in the convictions of Wall Street figures Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken for insider trading. He also spearheaded the effort to jail drug dealers, combat organized crime, break the web of corruption in government, and prosecute white-collar criminals. He amassed a record of 4,152 convictions and 25 reversals. As a federal prosecutor, Giuliani was credited with bringing the "perp walk" [probably although not certainly a CIA mitigation device], parading of suspects in front of the previously alerted media, into common use as a prosecutorial tool. After Giuliani "patented the perp walk", the tool was used by increasing numbers of prosecutors nationwide [end citation].

The Predators' Ball: The Inside Story of Drexel Burnham and the Rise of the Junk Bond Raiders (Paperback) by Connie Bruck essentially outlines the CIA restructuring of the economy which Giuliani covered and concealed. Which he materially furthered and enabled. The book does NOT discuss his positioning Marc Rich and Pincus Green as CIA mechanisms in Europe attacking other people and nations however, and you have to read it understanding it to be a mirror reflecting only half of the true operation.

In totality, can we quantify CIA involvement with Rudy Giuliani?

FBI: Mob Considered 'Whacking' Rudy Giuliani, CBS News Interactive: Campaign 2008. NEW YORK (CBS) ― The bosses of New York's five Mafia families discussed killing Rudy Giuliani in 1986 when he was a mob-busting federal prosecutor, according to testimony Wednesday in the murder trial of a former FBI agent.

[The old 'Murder Inc.' was half Jews and half Italians but the Jews went into management. Understand the Mafia as we know it is really an Allen Dulles creation which originated in cornering organized gambling as a funding mechanism and covering the alien in Hoover Dam with Las Vegas].

The details about the plot -- which never took shape -- were given to ex-FBI agent Roy Lindley DeVecchio by the late Gregory Scarpa Sr., a capo-turned-informant, according to the testimony of FBI agent William Bolinder. DeVecchio is accused of forming an illicit alliance with Scarpa that lead to at least four slayings. He has denied the allegations.

Before Giuliani became mayor of New York, he had a track record of high-profile mob prosecutions. In 1986 -- the same year the mobsters purportedly discussed the hit -- Giuliani indicted the heads of the five families in the so-called "Commission" trial. Giuliani is now a GOP presidential hopeful.

In testimony Wednesday, Bolinder said that DeVecchio's 1987 debriefing report stated Scarpa told him the late Gambino crime boss John Gotti was for ordering the hit, and had the support of the leader of the Colombo crime family, but the heads of the Bonanno, Lucchese and Genovese groups were against the idea, and it never materialized.

Scarpa had a colorful history, and it wouldn't be the first time that outlandish stories followed him: He purportedly helped the FBI solve the 1964 murders of three civil-rights workers in Mississippi by strong-arming a Ku Klux Klan member [THIS ORIGINAL CRIME IN 1964 ENABLED THE CIA TO CORRUPT THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT].

DeVecchio, 66, has pleaded not guilty in state Supreme Court in Brooklyn to four counts of murder in what prosecutors have billed as one of the worst law enforcement corruption cases in U.S. history. At his request, the trial is being heard by a judge and not a jury.

Prosecutors say Scarpa showered DeVecchio with cash, stolen jewelry, liquor -- and even prostitutes -- in exchange for confidential information, according to an indictment. Scarpa used the inside tips about the identities and whereabouts of suspected rats and rivals to rub out at least four victims in the late 1980s and early 1990s, authorities said [end citation].

PHASE ONE 1970-1973
Frank Lucas unifying the New York heroin trade.
Frank Serpico bringing the CIA into NYPD.
[footnote David Harris and the ending of Joe Valachi].

PHASE TWO Mid1980s
Rudy Giuliani restructuring the New York Mafia-CIA.

In other words, in parallel to restructuring the corporate world, Giuliani was acting for the CIA in restructuring the crime world or transitioning it into the internationalist-era in support of foreign manufacturing and the export of our cashflow.

We don't know how he managed, but he also found time to participate in child abuse and child rape at West Point on behalf of the CIA or Defense Intelligence, depending on who you believe [actually, depending on migration of the MONARCH designator which is a story in itself; all we know for sure is that Giuliani was front and center].

No Cases to Be Filed In Abuse Complaints, New York Times, (Late Edition (East Coast)). New York, N.Y.: Oct 25, 1985, page B14.
A yearlong F.B.I. investigation into allegations of physical and sexual abuse at a day-care center at West Point ended today with findings of ''indications'' of abuse but ''insufficient substantive evidence to prosecute.''

The findings were contained in a statement by Rudolph W. Giuliani, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and in a letter to Lieut. General Willard W. Scott, the superintendent of the United States Military Academy at West Point, suggesting that therapy for the children might enable them to provide more evidence.

A Federal grand jury here concluded its work without voting any indictments. Mr. Giuliani's office said the inquiry involved interviews of more than 950 potential witnesses, including the children, who ranged in age from 2 through 6, and their parents as well as present and former employees... Years later (1991), the Federal government agreed to pay $2.7M to nine of the victims. [Wikipedia under the Giuliani heading].

That was them and Rudy covered it, leading to the kidnapping and rape of Johnny Gosch, Jacob Wetterling [whose mother recently ran for Congress without discussing the Giuliani involvement], and a host of other incidents disparaging to justice and our way of life. How can you possibly want him, 'the enabler,' one half of the threatened 'New York Ascension,' to be President of the United States?

Donald Kerr, undoubtedly a 'good christian' and 'voice of reason' front man for the George W. Bush regime.

Intel official: Expect less privacy, by PAMELA HESS, Associated Press,[12 Nov 2007]. WASHINGTON - As Congress debates new rules for government eavesdropping, a top intelligence official says it is time that people in the United States changed their definition of privacy...

I hate to say 'I told you so' but you let them take down Conrad Burns and this is what you get. IN SPADES.

...Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information.

Kerr's comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Lawmakers hastily changed the 1978 law last summer to allow the government to eavesdrop inside the United States without court permission, so long as one end of the conversation was reasonably believed to be located outside the U.S.

The original law required a court order for any surveillance conducted on U.S. soil, to protect Americans' privacy. The White House argued that the law was obstructing intelligence gathering because, as technology has changed, a growing amount of foreign communications passes through U.S.-based channels.

The most contentious issue in the new legislation is whether to shield telecommunications companies from civil lawsuits for allegedly giving the government access to people's private e-mails and phone calls without a FISA court order between 2001 and 2007.
Some lawmakers, including members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, appear reluctant to grant immunity. Suits might be the only way to determine how far the government has burrowed into people's privacy without court permission.

The committee is expected to decide this week whether its version of the bill will protect telecommunications companies. About 40 wiretapping suits are pending.
The central witness in a California lawsuit against AT&T says the government is vacuuming up billions of e-mails and phone calls as they pass through an AT&T switching station in San Francisco.

Mark Klein, a retired AT&T technician, helped connect a device in 2003 that he says diverted and copied onto a government supercomputer every call, e-mail, and Internet site access on AT&T lines.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action suit, claims there are as many as 20 such sites in the U.S.
The White House has promised to veto any bill that does not grant immunity from suits such as this one.

Congressional leaders hope to finish the bill by Thanksgiving. It would replace the FISA update enacted in August that privacy groups and civil libertarians say allows the government to read Americans' e-mails and listen to their phone calls without court oversight.

Kerr said at an October intelligence conference in San Antonio that he finds concerns that the government may be listening in odd when people are "perfectly willing for a green-card holder at an (Internet service provider) who may or may have not have been an illegal entrant to the United States to handle their data"...
[end citation]

Yeah - but the average green-card holder who may have been an illegal entrant typically isn't looking to screw your stock account and crash your mortgage, thwarting your choice at the polls and blatantly lying about a manufactured energy crisis. Possibly also ****ing with your wife and kids - does the CIA ever do that?

'Some people believe in Buddha, Moses, Jesus Walking on Water, etc.'

We hear from Bryan Adrian, of late in Eastern Europe.

'Why not 500 fallen "angels". They allegedly have no memory but are the only ones that can alter the 4th dimension matrix pinning down worldly affairs. They are not angelic nor impressive nor powerful. Just 500 dopes that are the only ones in the nth dimension dynamics, whatever that means. Every 75 years or so, a new batch.'
This may get into a paradigm outlined by Tom Robbins [Fierce Invalids Home From the Hot Climates published in 2000] and the timing is of interest - are they trying to refresh circulation of the information[?]. Adrian did not claim it originated with him but only passed the tip.

Why here and now?

Larry Craig is said to be or have been associated with a Masonic temple in New York which goes way beyond the Blue Lodge [Master Mason] degrees, essentially involving the upper levels of Scottish Rite. Usually that type of thing is suppose to work for you - which is the whole point, but its possible its now being used against Larry Craig.

Bush has attacked Larry Craig and somehow has a knife at his throat - I have no idea how or what it is [I'd guess Craig was setup in any toilet room scenario, but also suspect it goes well beyond that]. The effort is part of the continuing attack on the 'northwest interior states' which you can argue continues the whole way across to Minnesota; [in part because a lot of people are 'fat, dumb and happy,' and in part because the media is pretty much bought] that is an unusual perspective and I admit I have a 'heightened situational awareness.' I didn't think there were many people out there with a situational awareness heightened beyond mine, but a guy walks up to me and asks if I remembered the incident[s] in which the laptop computer[s] with all the VA data on it/them [names, addresses and social security numbers] were lost.

I said I did remember. The guy says that Larry Craig was on the VA subcommittee as ranking member, and they've knocked him off in preparing to attack the vets [beyond the induced 'Gulf War syndrome' and squalene at Dover Air Force Base for example].

No ****. I missed that possibility.

Don't doubt it. Abramoff went a long time, and now Bush has apparently set Craig up for the long haul - its definitely designed to erode democracy over time, and George W. Monkey will be making the most of it. He will be a busy guy with all his asinine CIA activities running full tilt.

About the graphic. Are there nuclear weapons buried in the public parks of Washington D.C., and, if there are, which parks are they in? DuPont Circle - under the eye of guys in the control tower at Reagan National, which looks up 19th St. NW.

Clear line of sight, which runs right passed the Council on Foreign Relations-owned World Bank headquarters. Supposedly Bill Clinton gave the United Nations 120 of our most advanced military airplanes in 1996 [the Aurora], wouldn't be surprised to find that was on top of some nukes which were already part of the deal.

The neighborhood has an interesting past from a political perspective.

From Wikipedia, CIA on the internet.
One such grand residence is the marble and terra cotta Patterson house at 15 Dupont Circle (currently the Washington Club). This Italianate mansion, the only survivor of the many mansions that once ringed the circle, was built in 1901 by New York architect Stanford White for Robert Patterson, editor of the Chicago Tribune, and his wife Nellie, heiress to the Chicago Tribune fortune. Upon Mrs. Patterson's incapacitation in the early 1920s, the house passed into the hands of her daughter, Cissy Patterson, who made it a hub of Washington social life. The house served as temporary quarters for President and Mrs. Calvin Coolidge in 1927 while the White House underwent renovation. The Coolidges welcomed Charles Lindbergh as a house guest after his historic transatlantic flight. Lindbergh made several public appearances at the house, waving to roaring crowds from the second-story balcony, and befriended the Patterson Family, with whom he increasingly came to share isolationist and pro-German views. Cissy Patterson later acquired the Washington Times-Herald (sold to The Washington Post in 1954) and declared journalistic warfare on Franklin D. Roosevelt from 15 Dupont Circle, continuing throughout World War II to push her policies, which were echoed in the New York Daily News, run by her brother Joseph Medill Patterson, and the Chicago Tribune, run by their first cousin, Colonel Robert R. McCormick.

More important, however, is that there seems to have been the means, methods, and opportunities to do it - if indeed it was done.

...Traffic circle [Wikipedia continued]
Construction of the traffic circle, originally called Pacific Circle, began in 1871. In 1882, Congress authorized a memorial statue of Samuel Francis Du Pont in recognition of his service as a rear admiral during the Civil War. A bronze statue was erected in 1884 in a park at the center of the circle. The Du Pont family moved the sculpture to Wilmington, Delaware in 1920, and commissioned the current double-tiered, white marble fountain from sculptor Daniel Chester French and architect Henry Bacon (the co-creators of the Lincoln Memorial). The fountain was installed in 1921 [or around the time the alien under the Hoover Dam was getting pulled out of the Arctic]. Three classical nude figures symbolizing the sea, the stars and the wind are carved on the fountain's shaft.

The present Connecticut Avenue traffic tunnel was built in 1949 as part of the now-defunct Capital Transit project. Many incorrectly think the traffic tunnel is where the streetcars operated. However, the streetcar tunnels were built in addition to the traffic tunnel and started a block north and south of the traffic tunnels. The tracks followed the outer perimeter of the circle and paralleled the traffic tunnel north of the circle underneath the Connecticut Avenue service roads. The purpose of the streetcar tunnels was to alleviate the traffic congestion created when the streetcars traveled (in both directions) around the circle's western side. After the demise of streetcar operation in January 1962, the tunnel entrances were filled in and paved over in August 1964, leaving only the traffic tunnel. The tunnel entrances were located where the tree-filled medians now stand north of N Street and between R and S Streets.

The tunnels (one northbound, one southbound) each contained an underground station (different from the present Dupont Circle Metro station). These stations are no longer used, and their entrances on the east and west sides of the circle are boarded up. An attempt in 1995 to redevelop the old southbound station as a food court called Dupont Down Under failed. In 2003 the owner of a 20 year lease to the space investigated possible uses without any significant progress. [end citation]

Where else?

Washington Circle. Count on it. If the nukes are anywhere they're there. Maybe directly under the statue. Just up Pennsylvania Avenue from the Old Executive Office Building, there is a clear sight line to Virginia from the west - though it lacks a sight line south to the Reagan National control tower which is blocked by the Lincoln Memorial.

Problem with both the DuPont Circle location and say the John Paul Jones statue down on the tidal basin in full unobstructed view of the Reagan National control tower: those are both fountain locations and in concept there might be a water leakage issue. What did they do - smear the nukes with axle grease before wrapping them in heavy plastic bags and burying them? Please. Heavy container - maybe protected or encased in lead.

I still like Fred.

Fred Thompson is running for the presidency of the United States.

Paul Barril is rumored to be the guy who shot down the airplane in Rwanda triggering the African holocaust of the Clinton years. Bill Richardson [also running for the presidency] and Peter Bourne are the CIA-orchestrated 'fixers' who attacked democracy in Japan by backing Gimento or the Liberal Democratic Party and undercutting coalition partners when Japan was struggling to emerge from the monolithic paradigm of single party rule in the mid-1990s.

The idea is that we are trying to move away from that, and Hillary Clinton is actually part of that. Not to let Bill Clinton off the hook - he was part of it too, and the CIA-Enron scandal with CIA-tech bubble crash were largely developed under his administration.

George W. Bush has been tottering on the edge for awhile. David Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures 96-2436 (Urbina) is suppose to be one of several mechanisms targeting him, though what makes that one special is not clear. Paul Friedman, a judge in the District of Columbia, has ties to a law firm - White & Case - which handles intellectual property and that may be an issue; supposedly Chris Shays [House of Representatives] was asking an ex-CIA guy at the Library of Congress about it but in private conversation the politicians are always willing go much further than they ever do in public. 'Exhibiting awareness' helps them 'preserve their virtue' but if they ultimately aren't willing to punch and stab it is difficult for others to use those gestures in fighting forward.

Cynthia McKinney was one of the few who really did fight.

That is off Capitol Hill, essentially from the ex-CIA guy. McKinney is mentioned in the court filings.

Many other people have been screwed in intellectual property law and the cases are fairly well known, including
John Lennon [LENWAR couplings, in New Jersey]
Jack Marchand [manufacturing gasoline as opposed to refining]
Judy Cunningham [healthcare organization originally in Carbindale, now of New York]
Ann Powers [Michigan]
Jan Weaver [Boston]
Peter Bis [Michigan]
etc etc etc.

Really, 'forever' copyright and patent laws have evolved to be wildly outside Constitutional parameters and badly need to be restricted [to 10 or 15 yrs at the most]. When a book was taken by horseback to a sailing ship it was copyrighted for ten years; it makes absolutely no sense to elongate that protection in the electronic age.

Anyway, a well-placed different source said a bunch of New York Jews were [are] setting up to take Bush down, and it isn't clear if Whitehead is that or if there is an alternate Plan B also in the works. They definitely did take McKinney down, and the situation quickly becomes somewhat attenuated.

Conrad Burns was seen having lunch on Capitol Hill with a bunch of Senators as reported in The Washington Post, and I'm sure he wasn't trying to stop them. The question is whether or not the Post reporting on that [vaguely disparaging in the manner in which they go after 'enemies of the ruling elite'] was an early counter-attack. Save that article; it could be evidence.

Bush was going to hit the canvas in the spring right about when his boys went after Corzine, around the time of the dinner with the humanoid-lizard and the World Bank meeting. Somehow Bush got around it then, and the Capitol Hill source says Urbina has been keeping the indictments sealed which might explain it.

Word on the street - also - is that a group of New York Jews is backing John Edwards.
Don't know if its the same New York Jews, but its a small world. How TRUE is that core allegation [the Jews are behind him]? Edwards definitely did pick up some big paychecks easy which came back to haunt him in New Orleans; weird point - a solid Jewish source tied to government security treats or anyway treated the possibility of 'Hillary becoming president' dismissively, and their internal communication mechanisms are outstanding. Why don't they like Obama? Well, it looks like Obama also has serious ties to the CIA. Maybe these are Reform Jews.

Is my support for Obama at all diminished? You betcha. Looks there's CIA in a church - Trinity - he's associated with on the South Side of Chicago, and that church is United Church of Christ [Baucus, Gregg, Jeffords and I].

Now Bush attacks Larry Craig of Idaho with a homosexuality accusation commensurate to the Gonzales resignation.

Smoking gun. Bush then takes off to raise money for Jeff Sessions [R-Ala] and Pete Domenici [R-New Mex] like there is no bad blood between them - while in real life there is plenty, as he tries to factionalize government and destroy the conservatives.

Bush hates conservatives.

He hates conservatives and understands his collectivist agenda of centralized authority will never be ratified by conservatives in government, so he does his level best to undermine them.

The card is difficult to read but illustrating the duality of the attack is critical to understanding what Bush is doing.

Forget about the U.S. Attorneys who Bush can fire at will - at issue is Gonzales disparaging habeas corpus evidently at the behest of Bush and CIA elements working the judiciary, and then when that didn't work, Bush attacking Larry Craig as they - Bush, Gonzales, and the CIA elements - try to back out of the situation.

We should get our guys out of Iran, but this is only background to that.

Bush is wrong to attack - going after George Allen with 'Macaca' in 1996 really with the aim of throwing that election and defining the election in 2008 - and he evidently is doing it again.

So in general it looks like Bush was setting up this attack on Craig as he was undertaking the attack on Burns with Abramoff [they utilize momentum in extending effectivity which probably reflects CIA plan or schedule 'block layout'];
it is another attack targeting the 'Great Plain' and mountain states;
and Burns actually comes out of it looking pretty good. He was a conservative either accepting or 'lured into taking' money with which to further his conservative values; maybe not solid exactly in the middle of the spectrum, Burns was definitely not out on a radical fringe.

I also very much like Larry Craig and feel he has done an excellent job representing Idaho in Washington D.C.

The Constitution actually does allow for the immunity of Congressional delegates who are on Congressional business; while that was never intended to authorize sex contacts of any kind I very much feel it was intended to shield delegates from attacks launched by the Executive.

Bush must go.

Bridge collapse in Mpls - at rush hour with an unknown number of people dead.

Gerald Vick was a detective - maybe sergeant - whose death was a 'marquee event' in the 2005 CIA 'Blue Death Cluster' which famously started in Providence, Rhode Island and rolled westward [Denver and 'the kid-who-shot-the-cop-after-a-party' fleeing to Mexico for a triumph of State Department mock serious negotiations about extradition into the death penalty blah blah blah].
Vick was Mpls; they killed him and then disparaged him because to pin a suspect on a tip he'd had to wait undercover in a bar for a couple hours late night - and he'd had a drink [the CIA pretty blatantly orchestrated his waiting in the bar - it wouldn't surprise me to hear they'd orchestrated the drink]. They killed him at something like 1:30 or 2:00 a.m. and then joyfully launched the big dragnet manhunt with street diagrams in the paper afterwards - it might have all taken place on the St. Paul side of the river without actually crossing into Mpls but anyhow the larger 'metropolitan area.'

Andrew Natsios was the CIA executive who took $9.4 billion dollars off the 'Big Dig' funding effort under Boston Harbor before going on to USAID and probably arranging the trouble in Darfur as well as furthering turmoil in Somalia.

The CIA, apparently through USAID and the World Bank when they don't do it themselves, bribes a very thin band of government bureaucrats, technicians, and rebels to raise Cain on the 'dark continent' - and keep Cain raised; don't let him waver even a little bit - at the behest of the Zionists and the Central Intelligence Agency in their global 'win/lose' scenario [as opposed to a 'win/win' scenario. I have yet to hear a single American citizen apart from the agencies say they want to keep the Africans - Chinese, Indians, whoever else - down for domination by the big corporations which are mostly Japanese anyway, but that is definitely the way the agencies think].

The designator for the Zionist/CIA trouble in Africa used to be KKMOUNTAIN around the time of the Idi Amin to Robert Mugabe CIA handoff at the behest of Allard Lowenstein right before AIDS in 1979.

The Natsios CIA effort on the 'Big Dig' - a tunnel under Boston Harbor where the overhead panels let go and supposedly killed a woman - very possibly falls in the 'larger overview designator' with the CIA bridge collapse in Mpls. My guess is the Agency somehow unifies its communication with federal, state and local highway inspectors, selecting a location and developing a scenario, perhaps based on bonds, grants and 'matching funding' as a way of laundering money for domestic CIA operations. Congress rushed through authorization for $250 million dollars in emergency funding and Bush signed it, while 800,000 square foot thirty story highrises in Chicago with concrete core and slabs and steel frame [elevators, finished bathrooms, lobby, base building mechanical/HVAC and storefront] used to cost about $45 million. Understand there may be some 'play' in that emergency funding which is going to the CIA.

Sorry about the dead people.

Cynical is saying they were hoping to get the school bus with the summer camp children; really cynical is saying there were divers in the water preventing people from escaping [killing them], as opposed to saying there were divers in the water hustling survivors off into a covert status with unnamed government agencies which merely sounds extreme [was an entire Navy Seal Class seen arriving at the Mpls/St. Paul Airport for example? You'd sure hate to waste an opportunity like that bridge demolition][sounds like something out of a Jeff Bridges movie - it may not be possible to be too cynical of government].

Inside scoop on the Mpls Bridge Crash ONLY on
The Indian on top of the Capital Dome is done up in scaffolding to look like the spire of an 'eastern temple,' Congress just recessed, and a HUGE police 'motorcade' was seen on Pennsylvania Ave SE around 10:40 p.m. on Monday, August 6th 2007.

Bush - and choice pick CIA Secretary of Defense Robert Gates - have been acting very confident about Iraq lately, though Bush is in danger of getting bounced out of office and they're trying to brazen through it.

It LOOKS LIKE Bush had a meeting with the lizard[s] who seem to influence the World Bank and may have significant input on U.S. policy. Bush must have left that meeting to go to Mpls.; and it looks like he is trying to crisis manage the economy into a CIA-designated 'infrastructure repair' recovery. Cheating is funny if you're an eighth grader, but it's disgraceful in a presidency. What unbelievable swine the guy is.

This is Warren Brown, owner/founder of CakeLove and Love Cafe in Washington D.C., now expanding into surrounding areas and other cities.

Washington City Paper wrote an initial story about CakeLove perhaps reflecting CIA proximity, including transition from a previous CIA media key - BITTERSWEET - to a then-current CIA media key - PASSION - which leads into CIA media analysis; City Paper was followed by extensive coverage by other media networks, channels, sources, and groups supporting widespread appearances.

Mr. Brown has been recognized as Small Business Person of the Year for the District by the Small Business Administration, and had his picture taken with Eleanor Holmes Norton, non-voting Representative in the House of Representatives though that, by itself, should not be taken to suggest Holmes Norton is actually a professional CIA executive.
The newsletter Ms. Norton's office sent out with the picture in it is apparently not posted on the web though her other newsletters are [the 2005 railroad accidents with tank cars leaking chlorine and killing people as Holmes Norton tried to get rail shipments restricted in the District of Columbia would actually be a much more compelling argument for CIA affiliation, while the CIA-orchestrated murder of children who were shot with handguns in the District of Columbia and Holmes Norton's support for gun control appears to be related but perhaps not closely coordinated].

CIA proximity to CakeLove - funny to the extent they separately induce AIDS in Africans and support Mugabe [do not expect Eleanor Holmes Norton or say previous Representative Howard Wolpe of Michigan to admit affiliation] - may or may not tie directly to Warren Brown himself; a school system in Virginia was considering banning cupcakes on birthdays allegedly for fear of terrorism and food poisoning but essentially with overtones of CIA involvement.
If the CIA has 'a cupcake designator' when you go into the cupcake industry the association may be accidental or may key on people other than Mr. Brown who the CIA managed to place in CakeLove, though under 50 U.S.C 401 et seq the Agency is suppose to inform officers of organizations they place people in, such as the ACLU for example.

No individual case is pivotal but together with other CIA pattern activities - at Starbucks and WalMart for example - a larger patterning of reconstruction in the American economy becomes clear. 'Why that is being done' may be more interesting than 'how they're doing it.'

PLEASE NOTE: In line with the movie TRANSFORMERS I highly recommend 'the frozen alien-being and power cube' under Hoover Dam scenario outlined at Just remember, BUSH IS SWINE.

Two CIA sources apparently independent of each other say that water from Mars was brought to Earth, agreeing that it was moved as ice, one saying it was the biblical rain of 'forty days and forty nights' with the other noncommittal beyond noting it had been placed in the upper atmosphere [assuming large chunks would rapidly fall, perhaps in a granular form].
That point may be supported by a comment in the front section of the Washington Post apparently in 2004, ridiculing the possibility atmosphere had been taken or removed from Mars - of course raising the possibility that something else had been taken or that the speaker was in error and atmosphere in fact had been taken from Mars though the point has not been referenced elsewhere as would be a usual CIA practice.

Megaflood Created Great Divide Between Britain and France, Dave Mosher
LiveScience Staff Writer,
Wed Jul 18, 1:25 PM ET

The cultural rift between Britain and France endures as an amusing mystery for many, but the physical divide between them can now be blamed on two ancient floods.

About 450,000 years ago, a "megaflood" breached a giant natural dam near the Dover strait and began the formation of the English Channel , according to a study detailed in the July 19 issue of the journal Nature. Following this first disastrous flood, a second deluge finished the job.

"The first was probably 100 times greater than the average discharge of the Mississippi River," said Sanjeev Gupta, a geologist at Imperial College London and co-author of the study. "But that's a conservative estimate—it could have been much larger."

Gupta said his team's findings quash previous, evidence-thin theories about how the island became severed from mainland Europe.

"Britain has been an island for only a very short time period, and we've put together the first clear evidence that the valley system in the English Channel was carved by a megaflood," Gupta said.

Chalky dam
Prior to the first megaflood, which originated from an enormous lake of freshwater in what is now the North Sea, a quaint river valley was the only waterway obstructing France and Britain. Inattentive to building materials, nature contained the monstrous, ice-locked lake with chalky stone.

"Some freak event, whatever it was, caused the dam to fail at some point," Gupta said, although he noted that the breach may have resulted from simply too much water built up behind the dam.

When the 19-mile-wide barrier failed, the deluge that followed carved an impressive basin 33 feet deep and almost 31 miles wide in a matter of weeks.

"The dimensions are enormous," Gupta said. "This was when sea levels were about 100 meters (328 feet) lower than today, when a lot of ocean water was locked up in ice sheets."

Double deluge
An even larger and more cataclysmic event, however, outdid the first megaflood, sometime prior to 180,000 years ago. This second deluge created the characteristic English Channel bottom seen today, according to the study.

The second torrent added insult to injury, whittling polished mesa-like islands out of the basin floor. Gupta said such structures are tell-tale signs of megafloods.

"The Channeled Scablands, in eastern Washington state, is an area where a huge ice-dammed lake created some of these extraordinary features," Gupta said. "They're analogous to what we see underwater in the English Channel."

Gupta is uncertain what initiated the second megaflood, but he thinks a large embankment of glacial deposits could have released freshwater that etched out canyon-like valleys.

Old evidence, new discovery
Making the discovery, Gupta explained, arose out of sheer boredom.
"I went to the library and came across an older book laying out this theory," Gupta said, noting that the author had little evidence to support it. Yet Gupta realized advances in sonar technology allowed mapping the English Channel's floor in high-resolution, which was done for purposes of ship safety. It was simply a matter of bringing the two pieces together, he pointed out.
"We were astonished by what we found. Quite frankly, we have better maps of Mars than we do of shallow seas around Britain," he said.....
[end citation].

Oh, swine - notice they don't name the older book. Pathetic. Rude. In real life, its medium probable the CIA tipped those guys or anyway obtained their funding. Hot topics include Atlantis and the likelihood of nuclear wars among peoples in the Gobi desert and northern India immediately pre-history; continental drift and the English Channel is reverse engineering beyond that.

Indian researcher out of London; could be the British are trying to refresh their relationship with the alien interface mechanism. Cool - sure beats killing blacks with AIDS; can we get rid of Mugabe now[?] - but definitely identify the original source work.

In The Chinese Roswell, by Hartwig Hausdorf [translated from German by Evamarie Mathaey and Waltraut Smith, New Paradigm Books, 1998], Hausdorf mentions an "underwater city of the Ryuku Islands... 350 miles south of the Japanese island of Kyushu. Off the coast of Okinawa.... not more than 100 feet down... the seeming ruins of a city that may be at least 8,000 years old - an urban center of massive, monolithic blocks fitted together in the manner of the prehistoric masons of the Inca...." [page 123].

The sparce and spare remains of this city, which seem actually to consist of five very scattered sub-surface archaeological sites, stretch along the ocean floor to the islands of Yonaguni, Kerema, and Aguni, as far as 311 miles from Okinawa. For long periods, there are no ruins.... we periodically swim over paved streets and crossroads, huge alter-like formations, and structures resembling grand staircases leading to broad plazas [page 124].

So Gupta's water release/English Channel research is prior to this, and may suggest ice cap 'water melt' in stages. Odd comment by a credible CIA source - Mars used to have water, but it was taken and brought to Earth. They represented that as the Great Flood at the time of Noah, taking place over 40 days and 40 nights. Wouldn't believe it but a brief paragraph appeared in the Washington Post front section in maybe 2004, citing some 'responsible' scientist who says the atmosphere of Mars was not stolen. Obviously raising the possibility other people think it was.

Yes, no, and maybe - somebody ought to make the CIA show their cards.

Justice Thomas attacked?!? Is this ‘deference to the states’ business finally catching up with him?

The ‘Empire by Incompetence’ [effort to expand authority in spite of deliberate malfeasance] government of George W. Bush is trying to push the interstate commerce clause in new directions – going after the medical marijuana users for example, while crying about the high cost of prescription drugs which may be a CIA funding mechanism and laboring to extend the federal jurisdiction in medicine which we know to be a CIA advocacy. Doesn’t automatically increase your respect for them. Cervical cancer and inoculation of college girls high school kids sixth graders in Texas – they really want to get those shots in your child, while totally denying any and all liability for autism, squalene in men at Dover Air Force Base, and Gulf War Syndrome generally.

Anyway, Justice Thomas has on occasion – all too rare – defied the Administration or at least dissented, and some home boys of his fell down on what look to be orchestrated drug busts. No single thing is beyond the realm of possibility – one relative was utilized to bust another who had previously been in trouble; Justice Thomas was very generous in picking up a child made homeless in the transaction, and the one busted is hopeful he – Justice Thomas – will send him some law books. CIA hates to let things lie; watch for somebody to use the law books in gaining freedom before undertaking murder, or for the kid Justice Thomas took in to be sour - something disparaging and bizarre.

Use of a child? CIA liberals would stop at nothing to take down Thomas – I wouldn’t put anything passed them. Then you find out it was Bush behind the CIA liberals.

The Rand Corporation – Mark A. Schuster in the Post on May 10 2007 A13 – is behind inoculation of the 6th graders. Didn’t they also push Agent Orange in Vietnam?

Peter Bis keeps office hours on Mass Ave between 2nd and 3rd Street NE. Couple guys walked up to him and start talking about a [negative] legacy from the Apollo missions unsolicited, and they didn’t precisely detail what they were driving at – if they even knew [it very possibly could have been a ‘put up’ conversation just for Peter Bis].
Looking at how we were manipulated into undertaking what became the space ‘race,’ Bis speculates the astronauts brought back a virus – though they were quarantined.
O.J. Simpson did a movie –Capricorn One– suggesting we never landed but faked the photos [to ‘Mars’], and he famously ended up in a CIA paradigm criminal docket.

The pattern of crew staffing led me to believe the Apollo 13 accident was orchestrated [an ‘off’ crew switched on and then had the accident while the original crew went on to subsequently undertake a successful mission], and the Tom Hanks movie with generous media coverage does nothing to diminish that suspicion; anyway, O.J. Simpson went on other movies which might have been CIA-arranged beyond that Hollywood as a whole looks like its CIA-arranged and perhaps always has been.

Senator Obama is of course a front runner in the 2008 campaign, and it looks like the CIA may be trying to clear a path for him to run through including with the recent attacks on Senator Clinton in the Washington Post. Confusion at the Agency – Senator Clinton has long been associated with the CIA, and there isn’t anything more CIA than a tell all book written by one of the old Watergate reporters [all right – maybe that’s Naval Intelligence] so it almost looks to be a spy-versus-spy campaign, which you’ve looked forward to ever since Mad Magazine ran cartoon strips featuring pointy face spy [black hat] and pointy face spy [white hat] trying to off each other with snakes packed in vending machines and trap doors outside fire exits. I don’t even like Senator Clinton, but I still insist the whole attack package is seriously in violation of Title 50 [50 U.S.C. Section 401 et seq]. Well, they want faith and maybe they’re thinking she isn’t strong in faith. Do they see the criminal hustler CIA-set up man ‘United States Attorney-fixing-Marc Rich-and-the-Michael Milken-Drexel-trial’ Giuliani as being stronger in faith? No, the Giuliani candidacy appears to be based in ‘New York Ascension’ which is a different CIA advocacy tracing to forced urbanization and an effort to diminish rural areas.

Funny – the Mad Magazine spy-versus-spy cartoons may have been a Bush effort to get people to think the spies really were fighting each other and not engaged in conspiracy to take over the world, but anyway the CIA shouldn’t be in electoral politics – particularly after Bush threw control of Congress to the Democrats in 2006.
Everybody knows Martin Luther King was killed by the government – the real question is whether or not he was in on it. If King was in on it, I would suggest he really was a dwarf in the civil rights movement next to somebody like Fred Hampton who undoubtedly had street creds to the extent they had to take him down for operational –as opposed to symbolic–reasons. Perhaps explaining why only people who aren’t heavily on the establishment tit can even talk the issue, but collaboration in the attack – radiating the ghetto, locking down a tremendous percentage of young black guys on possession charges - is wrong. You can’t be CIA-designated and not be part of it.

Speaking of which, Jack Albright [Army Major General] just died. I have suggested William Barr – CIA lawyer [was he briefly Attorney General?] gone on in telecommunications – is associated with radiating the ghetto ostensibly to cut the crime rate but more generally to get the population under control. ‘Flat wedding’ – reduced spontaneity – and reduced sexual proclivity; essentially they’re taking the top ten or fifteen percent off the range of human emotions with radiation. After the military, Albright stayed in telecommunications as a consultant and a guess is that he was at least aware of the situation whether or not he furthered the advocacy as George H. W. Bush who was then in the White House would have expected him to do. Also died – the Marine colonel who got pulled out of the Reserve and placed in command of the Embassy assignment worldwide following 9/11. Marines didn’t have any active officers who could have done that. Force Bush out.

Chinese oil refinery engineer Wu - who rose in parallel to George H.W. Bush in China - led the recent trade delegation to the United States. As a matter of official business, we tried to make the Chinese government put three billion dollars of their trade surplus into a private investment scheme with the Blackstone Group - as opposed to making them offer some Social Security-type program or rural health care for example. One of the Blackstone founders - Steve Schwarzman - was Skull & Bones at Yale. Schwarzman, who is head of the Kennedy Center, was born in February 1947. George W. Bush was born in July 1946, and Washington is trying to find out if they were Skull & Bones together [as it appears they would have been].

No official word on ties between Wu and George H. W. Bush, but on the other hand there haven't been any denials.

The ex-candidacy of New York Giuliani. It turns out Giuliani AND CIA gay marriage Mitt Romney were in on restructuring the U.S. economy with the junk bond predators of the mid to late 1980s. Ivan Boesky, the pack of them - here Michael Milken pictured.

Oh what SWINE.

Really shameless.

Okay - you work for the CIA and they have you do some of their dirty work which you maybe don't agree with but they have dirty photographs of you and maybe hold your daughter hostage. Afterwards you slink off with your tail between your legs and hide.
NO. These guys are brazen. The audacity in this is absolutely stunning. Not only did they do it but they want to capitalize on having done it on the inside track, while totally denying it to the innocent - by now overly innocent to-the-point-of-being- obtuse - general public.



It looks like Giuliani held off the enforcement community until the dirty work was done, and then - bizarre and uncalled for - Romney stepped in to spike the judge and create a CIA-orchestration scenario in the immediate prosecution of Milken though they liked Drexel Burnham Lambert enough to bring it out essentially whole as opposed to Arthur Anderson in CIA Enron for example. Drexel was a tool of the Jews while Anderson was a target of the Jews - anyhow Giuliani AND Romney actually deployed in the effort late 1980s.



First Female Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, with daughter who sat on the Bush campaign bus in 2000 - and made an award winning movie about it. Isn't that nurturing.
Nancy Pelosi is I think three years older than George W. Bush - and quite attractive though she is a Democrat and he is a Republican
[sighted in Washington D.C.: tee shirt for college girls with a donkey and the slogan 'best ass on campus'].
Of course it would be disappointing to discover Pelosi and Bush had a relationship prior to his becoming President or her becoming Speaker of the House.

That type of thing is just disparaging to democracy, and its the type of backdoor CIA deal Bush specializes in. On taking office in early 2007, she tried to take impeachment off the table though she knows Bush wiped New Orleans with Katrina in 2005.

What else is new cheating-wise inside the beltway? Merle Haggard apparently did a song for Hillary Clinton, woman who tortured Sheila Bilyeu across the late 1990s and has her own surveillance, communication, and threat mechanisms here in Washington D.C. though they aren't entirely her own. They really belong to the government and she just uses them, probably working with the New York Jews who tortured Dennis Sweeney across the late 1970s so bad that he finally shot Allard Lowenstein, man who brought AIDS to Africa at their behest.

Do we subsidize agriculture, or do we subsidize the ability of Cargill and ADM to manipulate the farmer? Nobody cared until Bush went to internationalize the New York Stock Exchange with privatized Social Security contributions [yours].
Bush-Pelosi whatever, Wolfowitz over at the World Bank definitely did park his girlfriend in a shady location. So the finance ministers of all our foreign allies show up for the annual World Bank meeting only to discover this crap going on.

You want New York to be the World's first choice for trading? Abolish Sarbanes-Oxley. Until you take the finite steps the talk and running around with women is so much noise.

Mr. Haggard calls his song "Hillary." I call it "Fighting Side of Me," though the reality is probably more Bush Clinton in 2008.

WHAT HAPPENED TO SENATOR CARPER'S LEG, and how did it happen? Turns out leg problems are contagious in the United States Senate. Did Burns not tell Corzine what happened in Montana? Did Corzine think that couldn't happen in New Jersey? Think again.

Joke inside the beltway. Is 'screaming in an ambulance' the new stylish way for United States Senators to travel?
No. Senator Johnson wasn't screaming.

The guy to the right is Richard Codey, a CIA executive who took over in New Jersey when McGreevey was busted down on homosexuality with an Israeli intelligence guy. He - Codey - then wanted to run for office as a CIA executive but the Senate wouldn't let him. Now - with Corzine down - he's back. In a way you want to say it serves them right for not cutting the head off the snake, but of course it is very, very wrong and an ominous sign for democracy. This is domestic terrorism like something out of the Middle East.

They're just swine, and Jon Tester was not immediately involved in this. Its the guys behind Tester we're worried about.

The situation is not good here in Washington D.C.; the bad guys own the media. They may own media to the extent of making the Cubs lose in trying to devalue the Chicago Tribune - know there is a certain amount of fraud involved in that ownership. The battle lines are pretty tight but the CIA is endlessly corrupting and you can't help but worry they have 'enemies in the camp.' They certainly do have communications mechanisms - either remote or they can get somebody to tell them; the idea is that the Senate better get damn hard damn fast.

This is true - an 'ex-CIA guy' at Library of Congress says they're going after seated federal judges. The United States Attorney in New Mexico deserved to be fired. He let the CIA pull a fraudulent regime change in the Albuquerque Police Department - needed or not, it was definitely fraudulent and even today they haven't admitted what went on. What they did was totally in violation of 50 USC Section 401 et seq. and the CIA is not your reform mechanism.

Instead that guy gets on his high horse, actually lies about the Bible citation he included in his resignation email [how low can it possibly get?!? Alleged 'slip of the thumb,' he says he intended to send a scripture reference in opposition to the scheme instead of the one he actually sent which suggested he was peacefully going along with it], and they turn to go after federal judges. A guess is that they'll hit 'mix bag' - a couple who deserve it for going along with the scam too far for too long, but mostly good ones who in general resisted their scheming.

A lot of people were hurt - do they intend to prosecute George Allen for "Macaca"? Tag him with some kind of civil rights violation? For all we know, federal prosecutors may have opened an investigation not intending to prosecute the CIA guys who then ambushed Allen with everything from Jewish ancestry to spitting on his ex-wife [again in total, huge, pervasive violation of 50 USC Sec 401 et seq], but to prosecute Allen for a racial slur and maybe the spitting. Was that also a civil rights violation? Swine.

Take a minute to start back where it all began.

A Philadelphia banker named Jay Cooke financed the Civil War for Abraham Lincoln. Somebody - person or persons unknown - then broke him on Duluth Minn., sweeping Lionel Rothschild to power and with him a man he was using as a dupe or a puppet at some level - J.P.Morgan.
The panic of 1907 led to formation of the Federal Reserve system backed by private banks as designed by Paul Warburg and enacted under Wilson, following which the United States was lured into World War One and the Zionist Jews got the Balfour Declaration in 1917.
The betrayal sequence which brought about America's entry into the war rather than the French surrender predictably led to a certain amount of animosity and the Holocaust predictably led to the creation of the State of Israel over George Marshal's better judgment, but that was in 1947~48. The Jews did not know for sure when that was going to happen.
[Interesting point - no one has ever speculated about Jews making Versailles particularly punitive intending to start a second war, but it is possible].

The guess is that Lionel Rothschild and Paul Warburg set up the Federal Reserve as a funding mechanism for Israel before Israel even existed.

Oh those duplicitous Jews! Of course we need to end that practice - and capture that revenue stream - before we can be credible as a peace broker in the Middle East; the problem is that enriching Israel has definitely equated to [or been an aspect of] keeping her neighbors poor, weak, backward and divided.

A rare bit of good news - we previously identified Reinhard Heydrich as the first real United Nations ambassador to the aliens. A hunch, perhaps supported by some vague indicators, is that George Patten was the second.

Reinhard Heydrich, first ambassador of the United Nations to the Aliens. How that came to pass is quite a story.

In approximately the September time frame of 1941, the Germans launched a peace initiative. Germany's nuclear design engineer, Werner Heisenberg, went to Denmark and offered to hold up development/production of nuclear weapons through Bohr, and Himmler's two ace players, Reinhard Heydrich and Walter Shellenberg, went to Norway with Schellenberg continuing on to Sweden.
Right around that time Heydrich was given responsibility for defense manufacturing in the now divided Czechoslovakia [Shellenberg suggests it was immediately before their trip], and it appears that at least for Heydrich that activity was precursor training for industrial support in an exile government.
May 1942 British-trained commandos allegedly 'killed' Heydrich but they evidently didn't really do it, and the involvement of the British in that plot is probably the ultimate proof criteria for multinational involvement.

Anyway, only after Heydrich and Schellenberg returned from Norway did the killing of Jews begin and then on a modest scale. The now famous Wannsee Conference was scheduled for December 1941 but another travel pattern forced its delay to January 1942, and after that the mass, systematic slaughter of Jews really began. It very much LOOKS LIKE the travel pattern - and probably contact with the allies in neutral countries - figured into the Holocaust.

Not once but TWICE there are thought to have been international conferences over the fate of the Jews - most likely between Britain and Germany but probably with additional American support for the contacts probably involving Allen Dulles, and only following those contacts did the Germans act.

Heydrich probably brought his oldest son and his younger brother into exile with him.

Germans had a plant for processing nuclear material at Auschwitz, and it required so much labor they eventually made it a work camp of its own [it became a satellite camp of the infamous Auschwitz]. The plant was run by I.G.Farben for sure, and it appears to have been funded by I.G. Farben as a proprietary - they anticipated nuclear power certainly in Germany and perhaps across Europe. Pope John Paul II - shown here as a priest in Niegowici 1948 - was a salesman for I.G. Farben during the war. That he worked in the 'Solvay chemical factory' is not disputed. Reports suggest he did not sell the Nazis the infamous Zyklon-B unscented used to kill Jews but cyanide, and we're waiting to see if cyanide somehow figures into processing plutonium or other nuclear materials - a fissionable fuel like thorium, a supplement like polonium, or a 'trigger' material like deuterium or tritium.
Krakow is/was fairly close to Auschwitz, and Werner Heisenberg - man behind Germany's nuclear effort - is known to have visited Krakow in November or early December 1943 which I suspect relates to determining the purity of the output. The salesmen responsible for delivering virtually any chemicals involved in that process were presumably available at that time and its interesting to speculate they met - Heisenberg and the future Pope John Paul II.

Arguing against it, Heisenberg was a big shot and John Paul II was not at least at that time, but on the other hand Heisenberg - many Nazis including Walter Schellenberg who was head of counterintelligence presumably including for the nuclear effort - was a fairly young man [in an emergent field] to be in such an important position, they took a collaborative approach certainly among themselves and probably with I.G.Farben who funded the plant, they had a deal cooked up with Allen Dulles which guaranteed the plant was not going to get bombed, and in return for that deal it is quite likely they fed some Allied intelligence mechanism on the ground which may well have included the Catholic Church. It is a Yes/No question - they dealt him in or they didn't, and you could probably have seen it one way or the other for sure in late 1943.

Heard it here first - Pope John Paul II looks to have been tied to an Allen Dulles 'reciprocity concept' exchange mechanism dating back to the war. Perhaps now supported by the argument for making him a Saint. What a bunch of **** that is; corrupt patron saint of the CIA.

Please note that author William Cooper, reliable in bringing forward other matters if not always with precision, says the future Pope in fact did sell the Nazis at least some amounts of Zyklon B in addition to cyanide and malathion, but the point here is that we suspect John Paul II was involved in Germany's nuclear effort beyond the death camp issue.

Phony Repose, and Stolen Picasso.

What is really going on? Washington Post 03 March 2007 runs a front page story on the Indians trying to kick the Negroes out of the five tribes who owned slaves and were forced to free them and assimilate them by treaty in 1866 at the end of the Civil War. For a hundred plus years nobody gave a damn, only now the stakes include a piece of the $22 billion-dollar-a-year Indian/CIA unified casino gambling take.

Interesting question - are the Indians or the CIA trying to force the Negroes out? Could be the CIA, to the extent they've gotten the federal courts to go along with it this time as far as they have. $22 billion is $22 billion - more for the CIA if they can force out the last few Negroes who conceptually have a share. So your taxes go down because the government increases its revenue income? Hardly - whatever they get in franchise gambling money is dedicated 'CIA haul' or swag, which beyond token lip service essentially evades legislative oversight [unless the legislative branch is given all the numbers and account data with commensurate funding transfer requests, voting to reauthorize it every year].

Lining up to take down one man even though he was a seated United States Senator - Conrad Burns - would conceptually be almost secondary to that larger evasion were it not for the 'momentum' or increasing effectivity of a conspiracy designed to rot the inside of representative democracy, leaving only a hollow shell. If there was a true national security need to turn control of Congress over to the opposition party Burns probably would have crossed the aisle for them but that wasn't what they wanted. 'Extending their reach' is what they wanted - and what they've done, totally in violation of 50 U.S.C. 401 et seq., which is the United States Codes section conceptually governing the security agencies. This is the story of how they've overthrown - or undermined - that, now - here, below, following the PHOENIX paradigm - with the completed betrayal of the First World War [Part I Russia and Part II Europe] unified online for the first time.

About the picture. Our wealth and our 'treasure' GONE in a CIA manipulation scenario. Literally, our art has been taken out of the National Gallery and hocked or pawned, loosely collateralizing our debt sales/deficit spending. Looks like the Asians have it. More than one John Singer Sargent work, here showing 'Repose' circa 1911 - the end of the pre-World War I-era.

End-of-the-era then, and end-of-the-era now if Bush has his way and the deficit spending continues. Greedy Asians killed 'the goose that laid the golden egg' when they struck for the art.

Now Picasso[s] get at least conceptually stolen in France or anyway they're gone, with strangers or for the insurance money. Could be related - CIA setting up an international market in 'covert' if not exactly stolen art. Gray market art. Might be easier to get full value in a wider market, and having illicit but quasi-legal paintings out of the National Gallery would legitimize the Picasso movement if it is related, noting CIA famously goes back to the trough.

UNIFICATION. Previously talked about Pope Pius XII and we previously talked nuclear weapons. NOW an emergent discovery - two for two. Pius XII addressing Pontifical Academy of Sciences 21 Feb 1943 on nuclear weapons.
"The thought of the construction of a uranium machine cannot be regarded as merely utopian. It is important, above all, however, to prevent this reaction from taking place as an explosion... Otherwise, a dangerous catastrophe might occur."

He wasn't suppose to know they were doing that. This is the Nazis using the Pope in mitigation during World War II. - your information source.

Vela satellite, of the type which detected a nuclear explosion in the Indian Ocean 1979.

The dot is where they piped off the explosion.

Really at issue is a CIA executive named Allard Lowenstein bringing AIDS to Africa, about the same time he made Robert Mugabe head of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe, effectively shutting down the former 'bread basket' of Africa and making the continent dependent on CIA bio-engineered grain from the United States.

How could he do that, and why did you pay for it? Why did you let him do that, or anyway why did the people you hired or voted for let him do that?

Operation PHOENIX was the American effort to kill people in South Vietnam. Everybody agrees to that. It was an effort which targeted and eliminated important people in the region. Everybody agrees to that as well.
Controversial, at least in retrospect it appears to have been an effort to eliminate
resistance to the Communist takeover, much as the 1956 riots in Hungary and 1968 Prague Spring were really mechanisms for extending and perpetuating Soviet rule, but not everybody agrees to that.

MKULTRA was an overview designator for original CIA research into man and his environment; MHCHAOS was a designator for domestic surveillance and manipulation. Both those designators were suppose to have ended years ago, and under 50 USC Section 401 et seq most of that activity is conceptually illegal. NOW we find out [from Wikipedia]:

In February 1994 Commodore Dieter Gerhardt, a convicted Soviet spy and former commander of South Africa's Simonstown naval base, talked about the incident upon his release from prison. He said:
"Although I was not directly involved in planning or carrying out the operation, I learned unofficially that the flash was produced by an Israeli-South African test, code-named Operation Phenix. The explosion was clean and was not supposed to be detected [TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE. Whether it was suppose to be detected or not is controversial. Highlighting is my emphasis]. But they were not as smart as they thought, and the weather changed – so the Americans were able to pick it up.”
On 20 April 1997, the Israeli daily newspaper Ha'aretz, quoted South African Deputy Foreign Minister Aziz Pahad as confirming that the flash over the Indian Ocean was indeed from a South African nuclear test. Soon afterwards Pahad reported that he had been misquoted and that he was merely repeating the rumors that had been circulating for years…..

If its true, in the old style so-called "OPERATION" PHOENIX - obviously still open in 1979 Indian Ocean though it was suppose to have ended in 1973 Vietnam - would probably be XXPHOENIX, with the two letter prefix varying depending on case or incident specific designators such as location or cost category.

The AIDS virus - or at least corrupting the envelope of the virus/pony, enabling the addition of specific disease types/riders - was developed under the MKULTRA overview designator as Subproject 110 MKNAOMI, transitioning into MKSEARCH/2 and supported by MKDELTA as a field activity. This would be the first we've heard of the larger AIDS epidemic having taken place under the PHOENIX heading but its certainly possible.

There is an administrative problem fitting the term [here PHOENIX] into fairly complex data base and sort capable software arrangements with only a two letter precursor. They must have more than just a two letter designator - there are other numbers or alpha-numeric sequences associated with it.

BLOGSPOT BLOCKED. The French conspired to throw the First World War. Sabotage their own effort, as outlined at

Somebody doesn’t want this getting out and is manipulating the site so at times only old postings show. Peter Bis is gracious in handling hot topics, has an audience, and the agencies follow his stuff pretty closely. For those reasons we initially posted the second half of that equation – precursor activities leading to the French conspiring to throw the First World War - at but we are now unified here. Most library sources agreeing and aspects of Lenin’s removal from Switzerland to Russia by the Germans incontroversial, some of this is paraphrased Wikipedia.

Alexander Parvus (Александр Парвус) was born Israel Lazarevich Gelfand (Израиль Лазаревич Гельфанд; his last name in English is sometimes rendered Gelfant, Helfant or Helphand) 08 Sep [Old Russian Calendar Aug 27] 1867 in Belarus shtetl Berezino, dying 12 Dec 1924 in Berlin.

The son of Jewish parents, he was a Russian revolutionary [Menshevik] and German Social Democrat. He was raised in Odessa, moving to Zurich at age 19, obtaining a doctorate in philosophy in 1891. By then he was openly a Marxist and had befriended German revolutionary Rosa Luxemburg. In 1900, he met Lenin for the first time apparently in Munich.
For many years he attempted to immigrate to the United States; his socialist revolutionary compatriots were already busy establishing a network of mostly Jewish revolutionaries here. Leon Trotsky lived briefly in New York City after Spain deported him in 1916; very much prior to Trotsky’s arrival some indicators suggest the so-called ‘Russian Revolution’ was intended to happen in Chicago but got blasted apart including by the ultimate reaction of the ‘middle class’ to the Haymarket Riot
…The Haymarket Riot - May 4, 1886 Chicago - is generally considered to have been an important influence on the origin of international May Day observances for workers. In popular literature this event inspired the caricature of "a bomb-throwing anarchist." The causes of the incident are still controversial, although deeply polarized attitudes separating the business class and the working class in late 19th century Chicago are generally acknowledged as having precipitated the tragedy and its aftermath…
and in the strength of Midwest agriculture [both urban and rural communities proving inhospitable though that was not immediately evident to participants]. Its an interesting point, perhaps driving to a fuller ‘internationalization’ of the effort much earlier than most scholars would be willing to articulate.

Anyway, German counter-intelligence penetrated the socialist revolutionary network and read Parvus’s work, coming to see him as a valued agent. Parvus developed the concept of using a foreign war to provoke an internal revolt within a country, and revived the Marxian paradigm of ‘permanent revolution’ which he lent Trotsky to be adapted by Lenin. Parvus was disliked by many in revolutionary circles for his love of wealth, luxury, and his taste for debauchery (i.e. holding frequent orgies in a Swiss hotel).

Parvus moved to Istanbul and lived there five years. He set up an arms trading company and became a financial and political advisor to the Young Turks. His firm dealt with deliveries of foodstuffs for the Turkish army, and he was in business with Krupp and Vickers Limited through the famous arms dealer Basil Zaharov. Weapons dealings with Vickers gave rise to suspicions he was also tied to British intelligence.
In Turkey, Parvus was close to German ambassador Baron Hans Freiherr von Wangenheim who was known to favor establishing revolutionary fifth columns among the allies. Consequently, Parvus offered ‘the plan’ to the German General Staff via Baron von Wangenheim. ‘THE PLAN’ IS WIDELY ACKNOWLEDGED to have included paralyzing Russia via a general strike financed by the German government (which, at the time, was at war with Russia and its allies). Von Wagenheim sent Parvus to Berlin where he arrived 06 Mar 1915 and presented a 20 page document titled "A preparation of massive political strikes in Russia" to the German government.

Two years later ‘The Plan’ included the effective capitulation of France and more speculatively their English allies in returning to the prewar status quo, following a fairly tight sequence of events starting with the Zimmermann Telegram announcing unrestricted submarine warfare and potential trouble with Mexico,
the Tsar’s abdication,
confirmation of the Zimmermann Telegram as genuine,
Lenin’s return to Russia by the Germans,
culminating in the mutiny of the French army following the intentionally disastrous ‘Nivelle Offensive’ and battles of Aisne II and Champagne III in March/April/May 1917,
thwarted only by the early arrival of the Americans firmly on the side of the British.

Parvus specialized in - and had significant credentials - on the Russian side. We do not at this time know with certainty if a second Jewish person [or more] came to be involved in ‘The Plan’ as it finally emerged but suspect there were additional elements given the mutiny among the French for example, the Balfour Declaration of the following November by which time it was clear the Allies would be victorious, and the ultimate German reaction which certainly included vilifying the Jews and slaughtering them during the Second World War.

All parties evidently thought they had a deal to end the war. Zimmermann sent the telegram, and eventually confirmed it after the American press had downplayed it perhaps reflecting elements of the conspiracy reaching into the American media, and the French certainly launched the suicide offensive.
Interestingly, the German pitch which was to have ‘closed the deal to end the war’ was delivered by their foreign minister Zimmermann through the future Pope Pius XII, who, failing this First World War peace plan then ignored the German slaughter of Jews in the 1940s and helped Nazis escape Europe following the Second World War.

Again, this is largely the Russian side of ‘The Plan,’ originally posted at http// because your news source,, is[was] occasionally blocked apparently as 'too controversial' for Clinton-esque ground surveillance mechanisms here in Washington D.C.

The Plan Part II [the European side].

Pius XII became Pope in 1939.
The profile alone is enough to be somewhat incriminating, but really, why did the Catholic Church certainly assist Nazis escaping Europe after World War II, and arguably cut a deal over the slaughter of Jews in the Holocaust?
Surprised to find the situation is more complicated than immediately meets the eye.

Arthur Zimmermann was the Foreign Minister of Germany during World War I, at least in 1917.
1. He sent Lenin from Switzerland back to Russia intending to overthrow the monarchy and start a revolution which would take Russia out of the war [and that worked], and
2. he sent the famous 'Zimmermann telegram' [Jan. 16 1917 discussed Mar. 29 1917 apparently after Zimmermenn discovered the Americans hadn't believed it] about resuming unrestricted submarine warfare which brought America into the war - as it happened on April 06 1917 [which also worked].

Two-for-two; sounds like Zimmermann was a successful guy. No, he wasn't - Germany ultimately was broken when the Americans arrived.

What really happened. The Jews played both sides of the coin, telling Zimmermann he would win if he did those two things, while telling the British they would bring America into the war for the British in return for Palestine [Balfour Declaration Nov 02 1917]. Oh those swine Zionists. You can imagine things did not go well for them when Germany had a second chance at bat so to speak, but again that seems to have been part of a pre-arranged deal. Not to legitimize it at all, Zionist leaders apparently agreed to sacrifice the majority of poor and lower class Jews in Eastern Europe in return for the subsequent independence of Israel [strange but true]. And the Nazis held up their end of the bargain, late in the war invading Hungary and stripping it of Jews when they could have done better focusing on the fighting.

1921 Cairo Churchill held a big meeting to split up the Middle East, and he had Allen Dulles and a Times of London reporter named Philip Graves undertake a disinformation effort, trying to diminish The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Publisher of the Times found out about the scheme and was murdered, and a woman named Gertrude Bell decided to set up the modern nation of Iraq as a monarchy, ultimately screwing us today.
Question: at least given Churchill's supporting move[s], why wasn't the Balfour Declaration alone 'enough'[?]. Why did 'the slaughter' have to happen? Did they try to settle in the 1920s and fail, with the second part of that question being 'was Balfour or whoever not strong enough to push the concept through the British foreign office which at the time was trying to dominate the Arabs[?]'.

Can't be sure, but - again horrible - it looks like the Zionists ultimately decided they had to establish the foundation of the Israeli state on a swine-like 'induced guilt trip' which they thought would last through the ages but the following generations overplayed in attacks on the Lebanese in the summer of 2006 for example.

I stand by that. Unfortunate and indeed horrible, I am pretty certain that is true.
The immediate question, however, is how it involves the Catholic Church.

The one point I can't really explain yet. Lenin went back to Russia Easter Sunday, famously calling Allen Dulles in Bern on his way out the door [I think Lenin really left on a Tuesday which gets into Dulles characteristics and assembly of the travel party, logistics etc.]. Zimmermann telegraph [January] was made explicit in March, and America entered the war in April [06 1917].

From Wikipedia, CIA on the internet.
At the end of June 1917, Zimmermann found the first real opportunity for paving the way to peace negotiations during his period of administration. At several meetings with Nuncio Eugenio Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII) and Uditore Szioppa, who were on a fact-finding mission, Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg and Arthur Zimmermann outlined their plans. There would be no annexations of territories, no border adjustments with Russia, Poland was to remain an independent state, all occupied areas of France and Belgium were to be evacuated, and Alsace-Lorraine would be ceded to France. The only exception in return was to be the restitution of all former German colonies to Germany.

"That none of these plans came to fruition was due to the fact that neither of the two German participants would be very much longer in office." No - or at least 'in the opinion of the ranking Germans' the plans did not come to fruition because they had been tricked by the Jews as the Zionist's picked up the Balfour Declaration. Anticipating that could explain why the famous Balfour Declaration is so low key - its just a one page letter as opposed to a grand document.

"As an afterthought, it was Chancellor von Bethmann-Hollweg's belief – unlike that of the General Staff's – that once the United States entered the war, the prospects for Germany would indeed be bleak." In other words, he had never believed in the premise of the effort to begin with, but the General Staff had been unified in the undertaking.

The last question then is 'what did the German Staff intend to do between the Russians leaving the war and the June peace initiative that would lead them to think they could swing it, and did they establish the timing of the June peace effort or was that predetermined [and my guess is that it was at least schematically 'predetermined' or scheduled].

Late Spring 1917.
A. March 15 Tsar Nicholas II abdicates.
B. March 20 Woodrow Wilson's cabinet votes to declare war on Germany.
C. April 02 Wilson delivers war address to Congress.
D. April 06 US declares war on Germany.
E. April 16-May 09 Nivelle Offensive [Second Battle of Aisne, Third Battle of Champagne] ending in French failure.
F. April 09 Canadian success at Battle of Vimy Ridge.
G. April 29 - May 20 Mutiny breaks out in French army.
H. Beginning May 12 and continuing, fighting resumes on the Italian front - the [ongoing] Battles of Isonzo, ending in Italian failure.

Again from Wikipedia [Nivelle Offensive]. When Robert Nivelle took over from Joseph Joffre as French Commander-in-Chief in December 1916, he argued that a massive onslaught on German lines would bring French victory in 48 hours. The plan was put into action on 16 April 1917 after support from France's Prime Minister, despite strong disapproval from other high-ranking officials.

The Nivelle offensive was a huge and costly undertaking, involving around 1.2 million troops and 7,000 artillery pieces on a broad front between Royle and Reims. Its main focus was a massive assault on the German positions along the Aisne river, in the Second Battle of the Aisne. From the start the plan, which had been in development since December 1916, was plagued by delays and information leaks. By the time it went into action in April 1917, the plans were well known to the German army, who took appropriate defensive measures as a result.

The offensive achieved very little in the way of territorial gain, nowhere near the 48-hour breakthrough envisaged. In the aftermath of its end on 9 May 1917, Nivelle was sacked, ending his career. There were over 187,000 French casualties alone, sparking widespread mutiny in the French army, including one famous incident where as the offensive was winding down the French 2nd division arrived on the battlefield, drunk and without guns....

Was Robert Nivelle Jewish, perhaps explaining Vichy collaboration during WWII?
Did the Jews orchestrate the mutiny in the French army or even throw those battles? Arranging the fall of the Czar looks more possible than throwing the battles; the December date [swap of Joffre for Nivelle] may explain German interactions with Lenin in Switzerland.
The French army was probably ripe for the mutiny. That would explain a lot; on the other hand I was expecting to see 'the Somme' or Verdun - one of the really huge World War I battle efforts. It is what it is. Again, standing by that overview in general AND alleging the Catholics were in on it or privy to it if not actively involved beyond the future Pope's conceptual peace effort.

Revised Standard Edition of pre-World War II 20th Century European History. Your awareness is very much appreciated. Please pass it on. Andrew Bestor, January~February 2007.
Peter Bis looks at the Vatican including as collaborating with the Nazis in World War II, and may be of interest; expands on points raised here and looks at the alien interface.

February 2007. Butte copper abruptly a hot topic in Washington D.C. as Chinese President / General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Hu Jintao locks down African copper supplies on a trip across the region [visiting eight countries]. CIA executive Andrew Natsios flew to Beijing ahead of time to coordinate aspects of the trip apparently including the stop in Sudan, where repression - particularly the CIA-originated Darfur controversy - appears to continue.

CIA created Hezbollah under Richard Helms in Tehran 1973 to 1979 as part of a larger regional shift he coordinated. Academics cling to the assumption we 'abandoned' Afghanistan once the Soviets pulled out but there really is no proof in support of the claim and some evidence to the contrary - specifically, the Taliban blowing down the two stone Buddha figures on their way out the door.
Picture that conversation:
"They want us to do what?"
"Blow down the Buddha figures."
"Allah curse the Americans."

Now the Janjaweed in Darfur are starting to look suspiciously familiar - CIA goes back to the trough, and it wouldn't be like them to miss a chance to corrupt a defined ethnicity by using it against another, taking the opportunity to maximize effectivity here by drawing the Chinese into what is essentially a multi-tier dominance scenario.
Previous civil war was largely north versus south along Islamic versus Christian and Animist lines, while Darfur is among Muslim people - perhaps giving the CIA an opportunity to stratify within that faith. Companion to Somalia, its a relief to discover there is life for a CIA executive after the 'big dig' CIA funding mechanism and running USAID which of course gave him the ties in Africa.

Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?
Natsios kills Negroes, Natsios kills Negroes.

Bill Richardson, CIA governor of New Mexico who recently completed CIA regime change in the Albuquerque Police Department and counterpart to Peter Bourne circa 1994~1996, checked in as an introduction to his presidential campaign. Traveling by private jet at the invitation of an NGO which now of course looks substantially discredited.

Specific on the copper: the CIA overthrew Salvador Allende in Chile to lock down the world's copper supply a few weeks before the Arab-Israeli War in 1973, forcing us to stay in the extraction paradigm rather than harvesting energy from the global gravitational field which apparently requires copper. Late 1970s into the 1980s we saw energy companies buying up the known resource locations and mining companies and folding them or otherwise effectively neutralizing the threat. That gets back to the work of Tesla at Wardenclyffe Tower in the early 1900s.

Tower itself was wood with a dome of sheath copper on it - in tonnage. 68 foot diameter. Shaft went down 120 feet under the tower, and iron pipe went down into the ground 300 feet below that [420' total].
J.P. Morgan backed the work, apparently far enough along to see that it could be done, and then pulled his support, overtly discouraging others from signing on though the episode has not been well documented in biographies of Morgan. Henry Ford was overtly antisemetic which is useful for people who seek to disparage him, but he did spend his own money trying to make specific points clear to the American people. Of course there hasn't been any effort to revisit the subtext of industrialization in years. An interesting man, smart money says Mike Mansfield was almost certainly in on the 'grand scheme' [coming in late] or at least knew about it. No, I can't say just good things about him - as Wyoming gets torn to shreds before our eyes, but on the other hand Bush is simply egregious in screwing 'the little guy' who Mansfield would have tried to defend.

At this point Mansfield would have talked, as opposed to people like Hillary Clinton who seeks to undertake regime replacement at home and Senator Obama with his gospel of mush. It is very likely Obama ties to a CIA executive named Cecil Butler in 'the great rape of Lawndale' [a Chicago neighborhood they took for a hundred fifty million dollars]. SWINE.

Main building itself still stands though the tower was torn down around the time America entered World War I [definite - 'by whom' is controversial].

December 2006 - January 2007. DID NOT HAPPEN. This time.

YOUR HELP in averting a possible so-called 'terrorist strike' at New Years/the Ford Memorial services/the Saddam Hanging/the 3,000th sad death in Iraq is very much appreciated. I was guessing an airplane impacting on the roof of the Capital to the west of the dome, but later in the day than the picture shows; the PROBLEM is that Bush and his crowd can still strike, and they very likely still have their guy[s] [be it lone gunman or 'terrorist' cell] hanging out there.

Bush is leaving.
President George W. Bush has begun the resignation sequence.
Attack on the judiciary [at least Rehnquest; less certain about O'Connor's husband],
attack on the legislative branch [the threats of September 2005 to get Roberts confirmed with the Senate looking like a bunch of damn monkeys and one Senator's wife subsequently kidnapped at knife point, two Senators attacked in campaign, the disparaging incidents in the House of Representatives without getting into Patrick Kennedy's waking up in a concrete barrier or Cynthia McKinney being attacked at the door];
the Europeans aren't willing to let this slide in front of the Chinese. Its the much vaulted New World Order and everybody knows everything. Thank God, at least to the extent it now pushes Bush out the door.

This is where Bush is at his most dangerous, however, and you can help protect our Constitutional processes by furthering awareness. Assistance is definitely appreciated.

First the casualties in Iraq spike to 3,000 in time for the holidays as Saddam Hussein is conceptually executed [I think it was actually a double and it isn't clear to me they filmed him fall], and Bush sets up to go after Cheney.
Then Negroponte makes his jump and gets caught in the musical chairs.
NOW Harriet Miers resigns which Bush is hoping will enable him to continue after Cheney. PROBLEM. Bush doesn't realize how immediately Miers ties to Nathan Hecht and Priscilla Owen in the 5th Circuit under Phil Gramm, and I can't believe guys down there are happy about their boat being rocked by Bush who is on his way out anyway.
Graphic is by Wonkette, which means everybody knows about it and they're just waiting.

Bush is leaving. Make him leave NOW.

They've been undertaking warrantless surveillance down in Texas to enforce a CIA funding scheme in energy, and that MUST change. For one thing, Jeffrey Skilling should have at least been allowed to articulate the issues, and for another my guess is that people still aren't happy about Cliff Baxter getting left on the side of a road in Sugar Land. Why is it the good guys get clipped and the ***holes walk? - well, some hearts down there aren't going to be broken when the CIA falls on it though as a rule my guess is that even for murdering Baxter they won't get more than bad letters in their files and a forced early retirement.

Mike Luttig was associated with a CIA case called Beazley. Definite. Certain, and he left the federal bench at about $150,000 thousand a year for Boeing at twice that - which was his punishment? The art of falling upwards.

Anyway Bush does not get to choose. Bush is out. Man who corrupted baseball and undertook exploratory drilling for the CIA leaves now. All the CIA funding mechanisms and advocacies - the Capital Punishment Advocacy and the CIA lethal injection death process - must be brought out and quantified. George H.W. Bush broke the moratorium on executions in Furman v. Georgia using Gary Gilmore when he was head of the CIA in 1976, but I don't think he's going to go to jail for it now.

They are actually working on George W. Bush's resignation speech now. Be brief and leave, because the lies just trash the system. Sanctimonious didn't have legs. Force Bush out.

Bush does not get to choose.

STILL can't upload graphic from the Kinkos at Penn Ave. SW and 8th St at 10:55 p.m. Friday December 29 2006 [now Wednesday Jan 03 2006]. The 'Jews' may be monitoring the computer interface as quantified by Bryan Adrian ongoing across July-Aug. 2006 [suggesting National Security Agency involvment] which was ultimately verbally confirmed by his CIA source; in any event I continue with text below.

CIA MOVEMENT as John Negroponte makes his move back to State. At the end of the Second World War, the OSS went to the State Department and it never really left. Counterintuitive but true: the problem - as evidenced by this latest bare knuckle coup attempt - is that the State Department has infiltrated the CIA, as opposed to CIA in the State Department. SWINE.
Beyond that the CIA has totally lost it's mission and is now attacking the American people. American death count in Iraq reaches 3,000 as Saddam Hussein is executed and we hold a big ceremonial in Washington D.C. for President Ford - what does that suggest to you? They jacked the death count. SWINE. Sorry about that, Middle America.

ORIGINAL DEAL. So-called Homeland Security is the suck department of government no doubt.

Word on the street is that seventeen United States Senators are implanted with an invasive neuroprosthetic developed under the CIA MKULTRA Subproject 119 designator. Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Russ Feingold, John McCain, Jon Kyl, John Thune included which gets interesting - where they did it to both Senators from the same state [NY and Arizona] they didn't cross party lines. I like Feingold and Kyl and would vote for them; I am not so fond of Clinton and McCain and would not vote for them. Anyway, the Japanese drugged me and kidnapped me and had me implanted when I was working construction in Tokyo mid1990s [1994/1995 - installation is a two step process]. Monitored visual interface; they've already got pictures of me beating my meat on three continents.

FOR REASON OR REASONS UNKNOWN somebody entered my apartment between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. on Sunday, December 24 2006 and took yet more photos and image sequences of me and what I call 'the big bone.' Exposed. Last minute Christmas shopping my *** so to speak. Naked and proud in a condition of 'regulated wakefulness,' apparently controlled by focused radiation to the hypothalamus. It is important for you to understand I was and would still be working this larger paradigm even if they hadn't done that.

NO, Bush did NOT attack though Saddam Hussein was hung and the death count in Iraq reached three thousand, in answering the original question: "Is George W. Bush going to have Vice President Cheney attacked [maybe on Capital Hill in Washington D.C. between 7:30 and 9:30 p.m. on December 30 2006 when he [Cheney] speaks on Saturday night][?]." Again your awareness thwarted the Bush 'One World' agenda. Many thanks.

Bush is already attacking Cheney with Plame for example - technically the issue is[was] expanding the attack.

What made us - or anyway me - think he might. Notice in the Senate park last Septemberish about Bush starting World War III at the New Year. Taped to a light post.
RECOVERED. Not the original sign but an updated copy which may be CIA-originated.
70 Week Prophecy of Abomination that maketh Desolate.... January 1, 2007 is the end of the 70 Week Prophecy and disaster will be upon this nation, and it will be caused by your President George W. Bush, and he will cause this nation to go to war, AGAIN!!!
Then some Bible citations.
Signed by Lance Ammon with email address provided and taped to light posts all over Washington D.C.
Can't say with any certainty Mr. Ammon is CIA or CIA-tied in some way, but on the other hand he doesn't deny an affiliation in his signage. Its even possible he's aware of the possibility but isn't able to identify an affiliation with certainty [particularly if he has a 'small group' of people 'supporting' him].

Did the original sign say "January"? Don't remember exactly what it said. But it was Septemberish and it seemed like either the New Year or January was a long way away.

..... [from previous] But Cheney will speak when Ford's body comes in, we've already talked about Bush throwing the election 2006 with the Abramoff attack on Burns and the ambush of George Allen, and an undercurrent of suspicion about CIA Robert Gates as well as a desire Bush has to bring Condi Rice forward.

Another thing. December 29th 2006 maybe seven forty five to eight thirty a.m., a probable male with a piece of garbage bag hiding his face stood in Senate park and then came over and hung near me for awhile. He definitely said the words "tit for tat," and something like "I'm going to kick your ****ing ***," in addition to muttering perhaps a long string of apparent random dirty words.
Homeless or not, the man carried two plastic garbage bags apparently filled with stuff. The one he carried over his left shoulder appeared to have a large piece of plastic torn from the bottom of it which he put over his face as a mask. Picture would help, but that's the sketch I prepared and can't now upload.

On 9/11 the explosives were already in the towers and the issue was actually the violation of the airspace as the pretense for blowing down the towers. A guess is that they wouldn't do anything at all unless they were already prepared to do it; last summer the CIA both drove a vehicle onto the visitor's center construction site and violated airspace over the Capital with a private plane maybe from Pennsylvania. An 'incident' might conceptually originate one way or the other.

Spooky - they already have the dupe guy[s] either in transit or loitering nearby; I guess not a classic 'dupe' but the red herring 'McVeigh disturbed lone ranger' type.
Lone gunman, lone gunman, grassy knoll, grassy knoll.

Tech unit in 'the crib' [their lair for prep work either in assembly or detection] had some sophisticated equipment in a van they may have calibrated the devices against when they installed them - and there was a Secret Service Police squad car parked out front last week with distinctive black and gold badge on the door.
Real common with the foreign surveillance and threat mechanisms - they 'flaunt' their guys. Visually saw one Secret Service guy near the car, and its interesting to speculate that might have been a similar 'statement.' The guy without the car really wouldn't be effective, because unless you looked real close you wouldn't know he was uniform Secret Service.

I had forgotten about the sign posted in the park last Septemberish but Peter Bis mentioned it the other day. And he is right - it was there.

Blogged and reported Friday, December 29 2006 at approximately 6:10 p.m. Eastern Standard time.
Updated [as was permitted] 11:00 to 12:00 p.m. Comment about 'flaunting' the Secret Service officer added Saturday Dec 30 2006 about 11:00 a.m.

Word on the street Washington D.C.
Not all the convicts conceptually executed in the CIA Capital Punishment Advocacy actually die.
Michael Bruce Ross in CIA M. Jodi Rell Connecticut was one who apparently did NOT.
Some are held - and used - by the CIA quite frankly as thugs.

I GUESSED it was called the "bullpen."
A source of unknown quality [talking to Peter Bis] used the word "stockyard."

Wall Street Journal Dec 04 2006 talks about JEB running as vice presidential candidate in 2008 [and Bush thinks longterm - throwing that one as the vice presidential candidate would give him the pole position on the race track in 2012]. Our country is badly screwed if JEB is even remotely possible.

Democrats worked a Bush 'swap' or trade [Gates for Bolton which is very WRONG].
The FEAR is that they are going to PALESTINIAN-IZE the Iraqis. Watch for collaboraters. Washington news which impacts Montana.

On the CIA unified ENERGY funding mechanism.

Note to previous discussions: Oct 27 1998 Skilling and Fastow of Enron had a meeting with Chase bankers in New York and Fastow MAY have used covert influences to secure favorable treatment at the meeting [even given a reduced credit rating, the bankers told Enron they wouldn’t squeeze them in a liquidity crisis or cash shortage but appreciated the ‘communication effort’ Enron engaged in]. He - Fastow - then turned around and created the hedge mechanism – putting it essentially under his own supervision - which eventually sank Enron.
The bonus point: Skilling and Fastow had hired a special guy from an English bank to come and do it for them [arrange private investment financing in the hedge – Michael Jaz-something] – but having hired him after a period of negotiating for some months, Fastow pulled the rug out from under the guy at the last minute. Somehow the CIA was utilizing those interim months, and it isn’t clear to me if they were only strategizing or actively aggrandizing the destruction sequence which was going to maximize their gain and everybody else’s pain in the orchestrated waves of short selling.

Doesn't diminish the 'Skilling and Baxter were stooges or patsy[ies]' argument, versus Fastow and my guess is his wife and Rebecca Mark who I think were probably CIA.

Jimmy Carter was TWICE drugged and kidnapped out of the White House so an invasive neuroprosthetic could be shoved up his ***[body, skull and brain]. John Simpson and Stuart Knight were running the Secret Service and basically turned on him. Carter conceptually went one-on-one with Begin and Anwar Sadat at Camp David, only the CIA took the opportunity to covertly put somebody in the room with him [anyway in retrospect that appears to have been the most likely excuse they would have used].
George Washington University hospital but NOT the head trauma unit which I think traces back to 1978 imaging capability. Brzezinsky looks to have been in charge of it, though an informer is saying it was Richard Helms as part of a larger CIA program schedule sequence which included bringing AIDS to Africa the next year apparently in a joint effort with the Israelis as a product of the precursor KKMOUNTAIN overview designator.

My random guess was that ROBERT GATES, CIA executive nominated to be SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, was in on it.

Gates left the CIA in 1974 to serve on the National Security Council, returning to the CIA in LATE 1979. He went over under either Nixon or Ford and stayed through Allard Lowenstein bringing AIDS to Africa and down selecting Robert Mugabe over Joshua Nkomo, apparently because Mugabe promised to starve the Negroes with land redistribution schemes [and single handedly destroyed the bread basket of Africa. Kicking the whites off their farms? Turns out that was CIA and not black nationalist]. Israelis put Lowenstein up to the Mugabe down select for sure as a legacy product of KKMOUNTAIN - we don't immediately know how they figured into AIDS beyond conferences with Lowenstein and De Beers paying for his trips. Interestingly, both Israel and the CIA date to 1947-48, and they both trace back to much older movements.

Trying to 'restrict awareness' plus the CIA character trait of 'tending to play executives forward' where possible - in the White House where you only have a fixed number of plausible co-conspirators anyway - probably means GATES WAS IN ON DRUGGING AND KIDNAPPING CARTER. He certainly didn't blow the whistle on it though of course that doesn't mean he was riding in the ambulance [or unmarked van or car] with the drugged president; they didn't plan it and do it in one night which is what makes me increasingly sure. It almost certainly was two nights as a baseline, and that's once you're all set. They might have opened an overview designator at least for scheduling purposes if not the cost codes [Secret Service is presumably salary but they may have had some blockers at intersections just to be safe]. First Lady was presumably drugged too, and an element must have taken control of the Secret Service command center, at least swapping in camera tapes from a previous night [my guess is that even in 1978 they couldn't just turn the cameras off]. They still needed to have 'fix' agents and officers coordinated, doctors scheduled, and the neuroprosthetic material [microscopic wire densely populated with electrode sites] available. Thinking out loud, they had to pay the doctor or anyway take care of his travel; the larger 'team' might have been Washington-based but knowing how the CIA will leverage I bet they probably used it as a teaching opportunity. My guess is that 'in a pinch' Peter Bourne could do an install - its only pushing wire against the curvature of the skull and you can probably practice on a mellon; radiating the visual cortex I bet there is some tolerance in the location of the wires and they had imaging - but anyway for Carter they probably brought in a specialist.
In 1978 the specialist might have been Bill Agnew out of Huntington Medical Research Institute in California but I hope not.

So that is your Secretary of Defense. NOT.

John Negroponte took down Richard Welch on the lawn in Athens, George H.W. Bush betrayed William Buckley, and it looks like Gates did Carter. And Gates intends to just sit there and smile at Carl Levin. Anywhere else in the world if you do something like that you slink off into an early retirement surf fishing in Hawaii or something - Gates needs the money. James A. Baker III needs the money. SWINE. No, this is more like the Latin American institutionalized corruption where a few families are the judges who live in gated communities and drive big SUVs with police escorts.

Senator Burns was taken down by the CIA gambling franchise enforcement mechanism, but he lived. Salvatore J. Culosi Jr., 37-year old optometrist in Fairfax Virginia was shot and killed January 2006 by Deval V. Bullock [triggerman] and David J. Baucom [paperwork] over highstakes card games, and Lionel Anderson, 46-year old construction worker was shot and killed November 2006 in Prince George County Maryland over highstakes dice [which is actually kind of a positive thing to the extent it reflects much prized multicultural diversity in the street level implementation of the CIA effort].

Where did this begin, and what leads the agencies to believe they can get away with it? Pictured is a swastika on a 1917 SOVIET [I think 5000] ruble note. At a basic level, 'big government' and the aspiration of a regulatory environment probably share common traits and values, but it increasingly looks like beyond that even there is a fair amount of racketeering and orchestration cutting across historical boundries which the individuals drawn into the immediate quagmire stumbled up against.

Some rare GOOD NEWS. Ms. Pelosi did NOT name Alcee Hastings, of the 372(c) judicial misconduct allegation and impeachment, head of the House intelligence committee. THANK YOU [Ms. Pelosi AND everybody who shared awareness on that].
Mitt Romney continues to gather GEORGE W. BUSH advisors in trying to assume the 'Bush legacy' which I ask you to utterly OPPOSE, and of course Giuliani is still a threat.

Profumo. English Brigadier 'mentioned in dispatches' [meaning he had in specific instances been heroic in WWII] going on to serve as Secretary of Defense [Minister], sacrificed in taking down a government in 1964 over a brief affair in 1961 for no other reason than ‘the New World Order’ felt it was time for a change.
Tragic or maybe pathetic story is how they recruited the girl to do it; hang around long enough and liberals will disgust you. Attempted abortion with a coat hanger, baby stillborn, at this point its difficult to understand exactly where their involvement began [CIA definitely was active orchestrating that type of thing in the United States at the time - the British may have been paralleling their activity but documentation is not as complete]. A LOT of liberals are CIA. 'Why would they do that' - well, for them its 'assuming the other side of the argument' for total situational dominance. End of the day they're just swine.

Mitt Romney and the CIA gay marriage agenda out of the liberal state which he is in charge of. Nothing against LDS - Latter Day Saints - in and of themselves, BUT we note CIA plays both sides of every coin, and it looks like Romney pushed the issue of gay marriage to get polygamy on the scoreboard. The show Big Love on cable t.v. and selective prosecution of a couple abusers in Utah [Warren Jeffs] which is also Romney territory at least since the Winter Olympics.

Why else pick Romney. CIA loyalty validation establishing him firmly in their paradigm, leveraging their asset is routine for them, and they also at least conceptually tried to float the CIA capital punishment advocacy at the same time which is an interesting contrast to gay marriage. As is polygamy.

The gay marriage advocacy [the 'CIA alternative marriage agenda' to the extent polygamy is included with the gay marriage advocacy] and the capital punishment advocacy have different nomenclature or identifiers.

Was the larger effort to push forward both unique identifiers at the same time given a third identifier with a designated project executive unique to the Statehouse in Boston? I don't know, but we're learning to ask the right questions.

End of the day they want to regulate polygamy rather than prohibit polygamy.

The only polygamy I have ever seen here in Washington D.C. happened to be same sex polygamy. Two gay guys in love with a third gay guy all lived together in what that community called a 'triad', and I am under the impression the one gay guy had a government security clearence. I have no idea what he wrote down as 'spouse' or 'partner' or who would get the insurance benefit. Let me be clear in saying I met all three men at various times, they were all very nice to me, and I believe they were at least as honest as any nonmarried heterosexual group would be under similar circumstances. On the other hand, I would not say you have a constitutional right to live like that or make an employer carry a potentially 'open' insurance burden though you do have a constitutional right to keep the government out of your house.

Houses are expensive. Why can't three guys go in on buying a house together [three buddies from college or even three guys who grew up together]. You bought the house - you certainly have the right to sit out on the porch. Three guys making out on the porch is entirely different - there is a huge gap between "don't ask - don't tell" and "show-and-tell" which a community can and will quickly react to. In my opinion, if its an honest community they will react the same way if they find one guy doing it with two - or more - girls though elements in the Mormon Church disagree. Guy hits a home run at a softball game, does he come running in to kiss all the wives? Would you make your kid turn away? All right, maybe Romney IS an honest politician in the Hillary Clinton mode for bringing these issues to the campaign trail and making us confront ourselves, but I disagree with the whole thing in its entirety - especially to the extent it is CIA orchestrated.

Having raised the issue, please drop out of the 2008 race right now. SWINE BUSH and his SWINE friends.

EVEN BETTER. for your Washington news.
Robert Gates is a professional CIA man nominated to replace Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense.

Pelosi spilled Conrad Burns in a CIA orchestration effort.

NOW - on Bush nominating Gates [Wednesday after the election] - Pelosi
is frantically trying to distance herself from it, nominating Murtha [the following Sunday] who opposes the CIA attacks in Iraq [essentially the CIA restructuring of Iraq] and fracturing the Democratic Party on the House side.

"Let peace begin with me." Why you bag lady; you're dirty in it and it has ruined you as First Female Speaker of the House.

SWINE. SWINE. Is there not an honest man - or woman - in our nation's capital? Oh, the shameful swine. There are, but the political structures seek to marginalize them. This, ladies and gentlemen, is but another manifestation of corruption in the so-called 'New World Order.'

Attack on Conrad Burns: The Continuing Saga [after the election Nov. 2006].
Energizer bunny of a plot to take him down, it keeps going and going. Pelosi just got busted conspiring in it, taking impeachment "off the table." Of course Bush would never have agreed to the deal if it was possible he would be damaged by it. Naming the 372(c) 'allegation of justicial misconduct' designee Alcee Hastings chairman of the intelligence committee was evidently also part of the fix.

Pelosi BUSTED in a strongly circumstantial case; trying to show she isn't just a BUSH TOOL she nominated John Murtha to be the Democratic whip in the House of Representatives. Murtha advocates immediate withdrawal of American from Iraq which would conceptually be a slap at the swine; Steny Hoyer, who was elected instead by the House Democrats, does not but looks at long term redeployment.
Council on Foreign Relations wanted to slap Bush and put her up to the Murtha nomination; interesting theory but either way First Female Speaker of the House Pelosi very probably has a CIA affiliation - tell your friends you heard about it here.

PLEASE NOTE that as they have very evidently been betrayed by the CIA I support pulling the troops out of Iraq NOW, and making the CIA 'face the music' with the Europeans in Afghanistan. The idea is not to criticize Pelosi
for trying to pull the troops; the idea is to oppose the larger racketeering. CIA IN THE 'HOOD [Tester Obama 2006]

Drought conditions linger in Great Plains. Many parts of the west are recovering from years of dry conditions, while areas from Texas to the Dakotas continue to struggle. Crops and livestock remain vulnerable. USA Today, Nov. 10-12, 2006.

Ignore the CIA weather manipulation issue at your own peril. Briefly mentioned the possibility of a 'plasma structure' created by artificial radiation holding the weather pattern over the Plains States, dating back to the killer Chicago heat wave in the 1990s with precursor testing bringing tornadoes to Connecticut in 1978 [Pennsylvania 1985] if you really want to go back that far.
At one time a Philadelphia hippy named
Ira Einhorn was an information mechanism they used roughly commensurate to New York Allard Lowenstein
[two Jewish guys in competing CIA manipulation scenarios - they probably hated each other]; Einhorn got jail while it looks like Lowenstein got to scam which makes no sense but that is how the CIA put it down - anyway, Einhorn was putting out weather data in the mid to late 1970s.
Missile defense in Alaska. What they'd probably do is create a plasma structure over North Korea or anyway over the Pacific and watch the warheads travel through it; the flight characteristic may even be one way they can differentiate between actual warheads and balloons or decoys.
Though at the moment this grand strategy is being used to screw parts of Montana and the Dakotas.
Einhorn had a girlfriend named Holly Maddux from Tyler Texas. The book about Einhorn is titled Unicorn which gets into a larger CIA pardigm, but it suggests Maddux was sexually abused for a brief period around the sixth grade by her father who was a Nazi, and the cops eventually found her stuffed in a suitcase in a storage space off Einhorn's back porch. THAT is what put Einhorn down and it was CIA; end of the day Einhorn lost and 'shutting down the communication mechanism' is screwing you today [after an orchestrated - and prolonged - flight and re-capture scenario, Einhorn remains in prison in Pennsylvania].

Mitt Romney supports gun control and outlawed assault rifles in Massachusetts. Please oppose his candidacy for anything; I believe the 2nd of the ten rights included in the original BILL OF RIGHTS pertains only to assault rifles held in potential opposition to the federal government and totally ignores fowling pieces or hunting as an issue [though hunting is of great interest to me]. A trend in Washington-based media is to significantly expand usage of the word 'machine gun,' which most people take to mean a weapon capable of sustained automatic fire but some liberals suggest is any weapon which can fire more than ten shots in a row without reloading. Just say 'NO.'
has also been previously associated with Benjamin Netanyahu, noting one of my sources observed indications of deepening ties between Jewish communities and the Later Day Saints in the course of a brief visit to Salt Lake City.

North Dakota officials argue for Fighting Sioux nickname
By DAVE KOLPACK, Associated Press Writer
November 9, 2006
GRAND FORKS, N.D. (AP) -- An NCAA ban on the use of the University of North Dakota's Fighting Sioux nickname is unfair to the school, Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem told a judge Thursday.
Stenehjem said the ban might cost Division II North Dakota (8-1, 6-1 North Central Conference) home field advantage in this year's football playoffs.
"No amount of damages the court can order would make up for that loss," Stenehjem told the judge.
Stenehjem went to court to seek a preliminary injunction to stop the NCAA from banning the nickname until a full hearing on the case is held.
UND is among a handful of schools with nicknames and logos that the NCAA considers hostile and abusive. Those schools are barred from holding postseason tournaments.

North Dakota officials sued the NCAA last month, claiming the ban is a breach of contract and violates antitrust laws. The NCAA argued that an exemption for UND would deprive the association of authority over its own championships.
Fargo attorney Wick Corwin, representing the NCAA, said it has the right to govern itself.
"NCAA events, no matter where they are held, must be conducted with respect, civility and free from any form of discrimination," Corwin said in court Thursday.
Northeast Central District Judge Lawrence Jahnke said he would not rule Thursday, but would make a decision soon.
"Obviously, this is a very emotional issue, a very controversial issue and a very sensitive issue," the judge said.
Updated on Thursday, Nov 9, 2006 3:54 pm EST

'Indian issue' started at Dartmouth maybe 1980s; somebody needs to do a time matrix to see if Laura Ingraham [CIA radio talkshow host] participated in that. The issue is CIA utilization or command of so-called civil rights structures and issue awareness.
Primary work rule of the CIA is that they have to keep busy, and from there the corruption flows like water into openings or vulnerability.
CIA gambling franchise at least pertaining to Indian casinos, attack on Burns, 'mascot naming litigation' issue probably do share overview nomenclature at a summary level.

You must be kidding.
First they kill Dru, and then they go after the school she attended? YES. A casual guess is that the Dean of Students or anyway somebody close is CIA, but I don't know that for sure and haven't looked closely at the situation.
ONE TIP maybe from February/March 2005 and I think from South Dakota rather than North Dakota. Two guys - identical twins - retired. One was federal government maybe State Department and I think the other was conceptual highway department.
They were CIA. At the time I was mainly reading the Rapid City newspaper, and whatever paper it was in did run it as a front page story with their picture [two men standing together side by side and smiling for the camera].
They COULD help. If you asked them to.

You can double click the image and it expands - wait for the larger 'expansion icon' to appear at the bottom of the expanded image and it can expand a second time.

MKULTRA was a CIA designator for research which was divided into about 140 subprojects. Seventeen United States Senators are implanted with a wire-based neuroprosthetic developed under Subproject 119 not really addressed on the internet beyond at my site []; AIDS was developed under Subproject 110 which had the special designator ‘MKNAOMI’ supported by Subproject 78 Bio Labs [A-5] and the MKNAOMI designator is commonly referenced. In fact its somewhat misleading, in that those subprojects were unified as MKSEARCH/2. A liberal CIA executive named Allard Lowenstein served a term in the House of Representatives as a Democrat from New York and brought AIDS to Africa apparently in 1979 when the CIA initiated a long term project destroying Rhodesia [ongoing – the circumstantial argument for dictator Robert Mugabe being CIA orchestrated is compelling], and Lowenstein was also involved in using neuroprosthetics to attack a man named Dennis Sweeney. There is overlap. He used Jewish people from New York to attack Sweeney and kept stopping in Israel as he went back and forth to Africa – safe bet the Israelis got the neuroprosthetic technology and figure in attempting to suppress it today. Their only camouflage is the bizarre nature of the stuff they do - as evidenced by this site. I started with the modest ambition of documenting a CIA attack on a United States Senator [actually, on two Senators] and it just keeps going and going.
Immediately at issue is cancer and obesity type of public health issues. MKULTRA Subproject 24 relates to Tuskegee blood testing – famously syphilis. The memo notes the possibility of manufacturing the carcinogenic [Methyl Cholanthrene] even in trace amounts in the host body. So-called ‘bird flu’ is very likely a CIA development, and on the east coast white tail deer are plagued by a ‘brain wasting disease’ which is really a brain wasting/flesh preservation condition. I’ve seen an image sequence of the opposite – a brain preservation/flesh rotting condition apparently tested on American servicemen starting in the Vietnam era.

If you set about to do it – or even if you’re negligent – it is possible to both weaken human physiology and render it conditionally vulnerable to specific diseases or infection by particular viruses. Looking at CIA involvement in capital punishment and abortion, its pretty evident they play both sides of the coin. Capital punishment AND opposition to capital punishment; in abortion I think they went one better and speculate Jane Roe [Norma McCorvey] flip flopped to represent both sides of the same coin. You get pretty cynical.
Jon Tester represents one side of the human physiology paradigm. If they naturally breed oats or grain or whatever a certain way or for certain characteristics he’ll start planting it and pushing it for them, geared toward rendering the body vulnerable in certain ways or achieving some desired end in chemical composition. They use kids in drugs and to commit crimes and take them – coax them into running away – and the really galling thing is that your tax dollars underwrote the scheme and the guy gets a pension. Or he gets a guaranteed market or a little bit of a break somewhere down the road - reverse engineering the way they RECORD THEIR LITTLE DEALS is a whole science in itself. Now of course they’re trying to distance themselves from Tester,
but essentially they can’t – it’s too circumstantial an argument. It ain’t easy but tends to move in fits and starts and we are in this together, opposing the CIA orchestration of government.

[Part I of what became a two part story continued above]

Too prejudicial for campaign. What I'm willing to tell you now that the voting is over.

This was all about bio-engineering and food supply.

Liberal Democrats are killing the black people. Actually, they’re killing us all. AIDS, wasting diseases, and other invidious activities of the CIA – the beginning of a schematic history. Can’t get around them; it is Bill and Hillary Clinton at the heart of perpetuating the New World Order scheme.

MKULTRA Subproject 24 was superficially a 1954 designation for an educational meeting involving Harold Abramson [allergist and immunologist in on the death of Frank Olson] and Robert Hyde [multiple LSD application projects, apparently inducing dissociative personalities]. The TIMING of the memo is dead on the number - 1954 [no idea whether or not 4 August is significant, but that's about eight months after Olson died more-or-less across the Thanksgiving holiday 1953] - and Abramson being an immunologist may be a supporting data point. No idea what Hyde's contribution would have been.

It very much appears, however, what they’re admitting to is the tip of a HUGE iceberg threatening us all 2006, and really driving to the heart of the liberal CIA Democrat conundrum. Not only does it back into AIDS, but it backs into American POWS being held in Vietnam and subjected to medical experimentation [specifically a wasting disease], the American cancer rate and genetic engineering of grains and alteration of our food supply essentially by or at the behest of the CIA.

CIA MKULTRA Subproject 24. Memo dated 04 August 1954 [to/from redacted]. In response to your request.... [medical citations provided]. George Wolf, Assistant Professor, University of Illinois. "Chemical Induction of Cancer", 1953. see esp. 29, 44 etc. By means of a special genetic technique, Strong, JK.C.I.5, 339, 1945 induced tumors with methylcholanthrene in many different tissues. Methyl Cholanthrene is a good initiator (high tumor incidence) and a good promoter (short latent period) -p.85 Wolf.
..... If this hydrocarbon can be produced in the laboratory by chemical transformations of normal constituents of the human organism, it is possible that the substance may arise in the body through a process of abnormal metabolism - and initiate cancer [underlined].
.....Carl Max Hasselmann and Hans Otto Johne in Arch. Dermato & Syphilis 188, 693-707, 1950 reported primary multiple skin carcinoma with simultaneous tertiary syphilis. Disturbances of the cholesterol metabolism, present in syphilis cases of long standing, as well as cancer cases are discussed with respect to the chemical reaction between the physiological substances [ ] and the cancerogenic substances [ ].....

Peter Buxtun went through a series of efforts over the course of several years trying to 'out' the Tuskegee program, with awareness dating from the late sixties to final publication by an Associated Press reporter named Jean Heller on July 25 1972 - at which point the story exploded. The overall sequence very much sounds like it was CIA manipulated, implying the Agency was active in the program from 1954 to 1972 [supported by MKSEARCH/2 documentation]. It is possible Mr. Buxtun may be able to identify key participants [maybe CIA people] based on orchestrated denials or partial releases of data in that time period.
How it went down - how they got the larger medical community to go along with what they had been doing - incremental release of information and directional shift with really no one responsible.
1968. Concern raised about ethics of study.
1969. CDC reaffirms need for study.
1970. First news articles condemn Tuskegee study [but gains support of local medical society which sounds like CIA adjudication], and after that the CIA played hot and cold faucets until Jean Heller ‘somehow got the story to break’ nation-wide.
July 1970 [ALSO]. Tom Harkin goes to Con Son, the island prison off the coast of Vietnam, with Hawkins and Anderson [Congressmen] along with Don Luce and Frank Walton who presumably were associated with the CIA. Harkin takes photographs which get published in Life [magazine]. Somehow those photographs fit into the continuity paradigm but we need to review them before commenting.
July 25 1972 Tuskegee story breaks. This is not to say either Jean Heller or Peter Buxtun are CIA, were planted by or for the CIA, or are in any way associated with the CIA.
Pre-1973 evacuation of American troops. 2006 we have credible reports of rumors about Black Syph or Black Clap [venereal diseases resisting penicillin] circulating among troops in Vietnam during the war, alleging infected soldiers would be left on Con Son or on an unnamed island in the Philippines and not permitted to return to the United States.
The continuity of the syphilis issue is the point; was MKULTRA Subproject 24 transitioned across the MKSEARCH era via the infected troops in Vietnam. WE THINK YES.
April 1975 Hong Le Webb ‘evacuated’ Vung Tau by fishing boat and is picked up by the United States Navy.
1975 [ALSO]. Con Son prison was conceptually closed with the fall of South Vietnam, noting the islands [Con Dao island group] are remote and access is limited even today by both practical and regulatory concerns.
Bobby Garwood CIA manipulation issue apparently designed to further a situational dominance paradigm.
1986/1987. American prisoners evacuated from Vietnam, hospitalized in the Philippines, and returned to Vietnam in a condition of captivity.
October 1992. Ross Perot [failed] October Surprise bid to free or ‘repatriate’ at least several Americans apparently living as escaped POWs in Thai/Burmese border area [Perot is prohibited by the CIA from doing that or publicizing the issue].
Mid 1990s. Hong Le and Jim Webb marry. Bill Clinton begins to ‘revisit’ Tuskegee issue with conceptual apologies and vaginal statements effectively evading recognition of the ongoing problem. Clinton certainly DOES NOT ever recognize any continuity in CIA MKULTRA testing whether or not it is Subproject 24 as we suspect.
Clinton narrowly avoids being impeached.
2006. Bush moves to normalize relations with Vietnam, while continuing the Clinton policy of lies and evasion regarding the possibility of POWs being found alive in general and on any CIA efforts to induce a wasting disease in particular.

Your awareness is appreciated. Please keep up the good fight.

Barack Obama only made it into the Senate after the CIA trashed Jack Ryan for him in Chicago 2004. NOW he's endorsed the entire CIA slate 2006 - certainly including Jon Tester, apparently working a fundraiser for him [Tester] in San Francisco after announcing his own 'potential' candidacy for the presidency in 2008 on national television. That is just audacity.

That is not Russ Feingold or Howard Dean. Ron Wyden out of Oregon, or Tom Carper out of Deleware.
These guys are not your normal Democrats.

And it looks like everybody else but Obama that one time has pretty much abandoned CIA Tester.
That isn't going to get him anything when he's trying to get legislation out of committee. Bad as they want the Senate, you don't see Clinton
getting cosy with him. Tester has said as much, and he must run a crew - you can probably get a feel for Montana CIA looking at his supporters.

To look ahead,
Clinton is yesterday, and Obama may [or may not] be tomorrow, but Russ Feingold is today and he's competitive in 2008. Montana is a small state in a big place - if you see Max Baucus you might tell him you are VERY disappointed in how things went down this year and you are hopeful the Democrats will not repeat this in 2008.

I support Conrad Burns. Compared to a CIA candidate who is the other man in a two person race, I HUGELY without reservation support Conrad Burns. Please vote, and
please vote for Conrad Burns.

Montana: Supporters Take to Streets to Get Burns Over the Top, Washington Post, Nov 06 2006 page A9. Tom Olsen in Billings complained about 'overkill' or saturation in the campaign. Understood. Any other campaign but this one and against the threat in Virginia as well - understood. Montana, you need to vote for Burns but that doesn't end it. The CIA will still be hanging over your heads, and they do not usually give you an opportunity to vote yes or no on their operations. This needs to be REAL CLEAR, and you can see they're setting their guys up for 2008.

Please vote, and please vote for Conrad Burns.

What an incredible year.

Late breaking Sunday UPDATE: Word on the streets of D.C. is that Webb's wife, Hong Le Webb, is in on the POW issue. I don't know how - expecting the worst, she is a securities lawyer and may arrange payments from the United States to the Vietnamese government for holding the Americans prisoner or something like that. Liberals are capable of rationalizing that type of thing and CIA liberals are double bad; certainly neither of them - Webb or his wife - have ever spoken of getting the POWs back. Ross Perot tried in 1992, and Webb had a chance but didn't support him then. Busy in Hollywood I suppose.

This is almost beyond belief. Raw audacity the Democrats would run the guy, but this is the team that Tester is a part of. Did the conspirators ever meet in Washington D.C. for instance; no idea. At this point its looking like bringing the group into the Senate somehow fit into the larger Bush plan, perhaps including further betrayal in Iraq. The New York Israeli lobby wants a permanent American military presence on the ground in the Middle East which is why the Democrats at the national level are not backing Lamont against Lieberman in Connecticut [the lack of support discussed in The Hill, a political tip sheet in Washington, 11/01/2006].

Montana needs two unencumbered votes on it in the Senate; please support Conrad Burns and
oppose CIA Tester.

PLEASE VOTE, and please vote for Burns.

Swine Bush is going to 'normalize relations' with Vietnam, and they're still holding about two thousand of our guys as prisoners of war. At one time they were held on the island in the lake above Hanoi, but the North Vietnamese couldn't maximize the value of electronic warfare technicians and a guess is that some went to China.
CIA Jon Tester is the Democrat candidate for United States Senate from Montana, but he is NOT the only CIA candidate the Democrats have put up in 2006. The Secretary of the Navy right around the time some prisoners were brought to Subic Bay, nursed back to health in the Navy hospital there, and RETURNED to Vietnam in a condition of captivity [C-130 trip each way] was JIM WEBB,

who has a Vietnamese wife practicing as a securities lawyer in Washington D.C. as Bush IS opening with Vietnam [IS - nothing you can do about that now],

and Webb IS now the Democrat candidate for the United States Senate from Virginia.

Fraud and deception. There's a class of them. Its Tester in a larger pattern of corruption. You want to say to at least leave Webb's wife out of it, but you know darn well the wife made the guy additionally attractive to them. SWINE.

PLEASE SUPPORT CONRAD BURNS. Oppose Jon Tester, oppose the CIA, and in particular oppose the CIA takeover of the Democratic Party. This shameful.

Burns Montana 2006. Please vote strong, and please oppose cheating at the polls.

Public Enemy No. 1. This is who did it to you. Charles Schumer is a wealthy Democrat from New York. The CIA left him a phone message saying they had Tester lined up, and he apparently didn’t look any further.

This is a young guy who worked hard and has an interesting story, but the Democrats and CIA liberal media have ruthlessly pedaled him up and down the eastern seaboard so hard people see through it. Russ Feingold is the Democrat I like, and I’m not dismissive of Howard Dean – both of whom have a better handle on issues Montana needs to address. Not my job to witch hunt for the Democrats, but I think they’re being very cynically misled by the people who buried Jack Ryan in 2004. The CIA is trying to leverage their asset.

Gun control should not be an issue - in part because the CIA hugely manipulates it - but also because it isn't central to the message of the Democratic Party. They use it because its a dependecy issue and not an empowering issue [it locks their constituency to them as opposed to driving toward the larger issue of personal freedom and responsibility]. In Montana you have that particular aspect of the problem solved, but at the national level they're little kids with it. They will try to stick it in if you turn your back.
I trust Dean to be smarter than that [don't trust him so much as to think he doesn't want it, but trust him to be smarter than trying to sneak it in], and I would think Max Baucus could take the message to the national party if enough people talked to him about it.
Barak Obama supports gun control. Flat out he does, and that should lose in Montana 2008. Not ducking it. Not silence on it. Oppose it. Once again you need to be voting.

Please vote, and please vote for Conrad Burns 2006.

Please OPPOSE CHEATING at the polls.

Of course
Chuck Schumer is not really public enemy number one, but he definitely does not speak for all Democrats. I think Hillary Clinton is out – New York is too far out of step with the rest of the country, and they didn’t show a lot of confidence in fixing Jeanine Pirro who by the grace of God blundered out as early as she did. Running the Obama cover might have been the CIA putting a crimp in her [Hillary's] style; Mark Warner of Virginia dropped out of the 2008 race but he didn’t drop out for Hillary.

Jon Tester is CIA.

Conrad Burns is a seated United States Senator up for reelection being attacked by the CIA, which President Bush adroitly tried to sidestep in visiting Montana for momentum on a western swing. Oh yeah; first they slammed Burns and now they need him. Montana needs him too. You can be cynical.

If you read this whole blogspot you will get mad; what they’ve done is just audacity and that’s only the part they’ve already done. ‘Stacking the deck,’ manipulation, cheating – and where they’re trying to go from here is ‘beyond the pale.’

Burns is a candidate;
Tester is a conspiracy.

I support Burns but admit Montana deserves two choices.

This year Montana only has one.

What the heck – if you are a Democrat, go ahead and write in “John Morrison.” That would definitely be a message. A big name Senator from New York,
Charles Schumer, was in charge of recruiting Senate candidates for the Democrats on a nationwide basis and he didn’t work very hard for you. Was 'the Tester scenario' something they told him they’d take care of in a ‘chance encounter’ the CIA arranged in a corridor, in a meeting they held across a desk, or in a phone message they left him?

I hope you do vote, but really Montana needs to drive hard into the Senate putting this – catastrophe? aberration? ‘bizarre situation’ by any standard – in the rearview mirror, and I ask you to
please vote for Conrad Burns.

Conrad Burns Montana 2006.

Alcee Hastings was a federal judge
– ousted in 1989 – who set the standard for judicial misconduct in the District of Columbia [pictured here with Janet Reno apparently post-ouster; defrocked parish priest with the Pope]. An allegation of judicial misconduct used to be called the 372(c), and this one guy was the benchmark. Noting a jury DID NOT find him guilty, three federal judges sat on him to hold him down while another two beat the crap out of him. FBI wiretapping and surveillance suggesting the guy solicited a bribe, and the Senate impeached him.

Hastings promptly ran for the House of Representatives from Florida, won, and the Democrats put him on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Where he now sits as a senior minority member, perhaps to be made chairman when the Democrats take control of the House. Swine in any case, and hugely diminishing our democracy while encouraging corruption and repression in places like China, there are two obvious alternatives - either the Democrats have gone stark raving mad, or impeaching Hastings and throwing him off the bench was a CIA scam to begin with. Either way its fraudulent and diminishes our democracy but saying the Democrats have gone mad is actually the lesser of two evils because if it was a CIA game there were five other judges and a fixed jury in on it too. In Washington D.C.; in buildings perhaps not ‘spitting distance’ from each other if you limited yourself to just one spit but a few good spits would certainly get you door-to-door.

John Kerry doesn’t need to apologize to the troops for a joke gone wrong – John Kerry needs to apologize to the nation for participating in a phony Bush orchestrated election crisis scam. This is disgraceful, this leadership ain’t Mike Mansfield, and these aren’t your mother’s Democrats.

Please do not add CIA Tester to this mix. You want to ‘send a message.’ I want to send a message too. Jon Tester is not the message to send.

Conrad Burns: right for Montana right now.

A fuller picture is starting to emerge. CIA leverages their capabilities and operations; trying to place one of their guys they decided to attack Conrad Burns. Scary - there are a bunch of guys like Tester floating around in other states but the CIA decided to try for situational dominance in seating two Democrats from Montana.
What is the backside to the structure attacking Burns? Well, I think its starting to emerge.
Minerals Management Service
gave '$3.4 billion dollars to the Office of Trust Fund Management on behalf of 41 Indian tribes and 20,000 individuals since 1982.'
There is very probably CIA in there somewhere.
That is probably one aspect of how they held the Indians in the CIA gambling franchise.
R.M. "Johnnie" Burton is director, but Lucy Querques Denett [Assistant Director] has been with the section/agency since 1982 and would be in a position to see it if she isn't in it herself; she is cross staffed as Assistant Program Director (Acting) of Royalty in Kind.
Deborah Gibbs Tschudy is Deputy Associate Director and also designated as Chief/Assistant Program Director [Acting] Onshore and Offshore Compliance and Asset Management.
The group is split up; Burton is in Washington D.C. but the other two are in Denver and headquarters of the domestic branch of the CIA moved to Denver in 2004/2005.

Please support Conrad Burns and oppose the CIA Tester orchestration.

My name is Andy Bestor. I got jumped by the Japanese when I was working construction in Tokyo 1992~1996. They chase me - the CIA is in on it, but on the run I've picked up a lot: George Bush is trying to throw the election in Montana to Jon Tester who seemingly has a nasty CIA affiliation.

Accordingly, I developed a snappy
'BUSH TESTER QUISLING 2006' graphic - FINALLY posted. George Bush is a snake and I am hopeful people let him know they don't approve of what he's done to Conrad Burns.

Please support Conrad Burns.

Oppose Bush and Tester. Turns out Bush is sensative to being identified with Quisling; well he should have thought of that before he decided to attack Senator Burns.

Jon Tester CIA.

Tester went organic in 1987 or 19 years ago and the timing of that is pretty interesting within the context of depopulating the Great Plains.

Buffalo Commons, Lorna Thackeray, Billings Gazette, June 18 2005. .... a couple academics from New Jersey suggested 18 years ago that the future of the Great Plains might lie in returning to a less developed past..... FRANK and DEBORAH POPPER... "I think, on the whole, it went from a completely crazy, Martian idea to a respected minority opinion," Frank Popper said.

At the same time, Bush may be pushing some people in. A couple from Houston moved up to eastern Montana and their move got quite a bit of publicity – he had run a big hotel next to Enron and she was in software or maybe it was the other way around, but ‘the manner it was announced’ and the media sources used makes the story about the move look orchestrated in retrospect. You shouldn’t have to worry about neighbors being part of some bizarre surveillance mechanism or CIA scheme. Tester is part of the problem, and Conrad Burns is not.

Conrad Burns is better. Burns is certainly not Agency [he's trying to defend himself from them], and I support Burns.

Lending a hand, Mike Dennison, Billings Gazette, October 30 2006. 'Demos hope Schweitzer popularity translates into legislative victories.' Not photographed standing on the lawn with CIA Jon Tester it won't [or anyway it looks like Tester in the background].
Absentee ballot number hitting record level, Charles S. Johnson, Gazette Oct. 30. That sounds like you've got the right idea Montana.
Bush is going to be in town on Thursday and I hope somebody takes him to the woodshed over the games he's been playing.
THE FEAR is that he's going to try to claim he helped Conrad Burns when nothing could be further from the truth. I'm supporting Senator Burns and
Bush has been a tremendous part of the problem attacking him.

Audacity -
Bush went to Virginia and still tried to undermine Senator Allen, who had to 'distance himself from Bush's remarks' but hopefully will win because NOBODY wants CIA candidates.

I do not support all Republican candidates or oppose all Democrats, but Conrad Burns is a good man.
Bush, on the other hand, is a snake in the grass;
believing they tried to cut some deal in attacking Senator Burns I think I can honestly ask you to please support Burns and
oppose Bush/Tester. I think that's what I'd call it, with Karl Rove mixed in there somewhere as another snake and that whole bunch makes me sick.

Counting on you to deliver.

Dru Sjodin, kidnapped, raped, and murdered, with media campaign and subsequent death prosecution in expansion of the CIA capital punishment advocacy.

What aspects of that was Jon Tester in on? What makes me think he was at least peripheral to it? To my surprise there's now a feeling in Washington D.C. that the Sjodin case - which we understand was at the other end of North Dakota - somehow caught 'Montana weather' though the extent to which it had impact isn't clear. Maybe they talked it in generalities before making their move, or maybe they had a team 'loiter' till the moment came.

Sjodin isn't the only case: Donald Fell, prosecuted by the federal government in Vermont as part of the CIA capital punishment advocacy is another. At issue is a narrow range of crimes which can draw 'fed death' even in states which have not been receptive to undertaking executions on their own, and Sjodin exactly meets the criteria.
Jon Tester has a CIA affiliation - is it run out of somewhere over the mountains like Spokane [police raping boys and a helicopter pilot in the reserves who was a mass murderer] or somewhere east as in Minneapolis. How is the domestic CIA structured: state-by-state or on a regional basis? Maybe some variation of both: a regional basis out of Denver [which would more likely put Tester in play for involvement], with a state-by-state direct link out of Washington D.C. which I bet is where they track 'CIA-in-the-statehouse' issues.
Ask him. Tester might enjoy talking about it [ain't just him or just Democrats - M.Jodi Rell, CIA Governor of Connecticut is Republican and up to her ears in it]. DO NOT let him treat the Sjodin allegation dismissively. He may NOT have shared awareness of the instance at the time, but he DEFINITELY does know they're in the statehouse, they're in death, and as the case unfolded over the years he had significant suspicions about it in his own mind if he didn't have absolute direct validation. There was a team on the ground plus surveillance in addition to the media contact which would have provided a hard link anyway, whether or not he went himself or knew of the teams which had.

That is so extreme - he'd go himself?
CIA is a weird outfit - I expect they'd see it as step in unification and confirmation; in turn it would be a little 'war story' or team participation effort he could refer back to. There could be mutually compelling reasons for him to jump in the truck and drive for twelve hours each way or something like that. He may lead a team, in which case this might be an example of leadership and sacrifice they could obliquely refer to in team building.

Its a serious thing - murder one of a pretty girl with commensurate national media campaign and death prosecution. I'm sure the CIA tries to leverage it in every way possible.

Rain could spoil record sugar beet harvest; About 2 weeks of good weather needed to get job done, farmers say, Jim Gransbery, Billings Gazette, October 26 2006.
You can believe this or not at your own peril - it is becoming clear the CIA orchestrates weather with a HAARP technology [High frequency Active Auroral Research Project].
Mad about the droughts [probably a plasma structure stabilized over the plains states]?
Go ahead and blame
Jon Tester.
Want to make them tell the truth about what is going on?
You should vote for Conrad Burns.

Not a subject matter expert on it, people say that working with the CIA, the Federal Reserve made money cheap in the 1970s into the 1980s, and then abruptly jacked the leash once the farmers were in debt and wiped them out. They simply confiscated the farmer's equity as a CIA funding mechanism, same as the 'savings & loan' crisis.
Jon Tester is not your friend. I see the weather manipulation as ultimately a land valuation issue, and think they're up to it again.
We have to stop them, and I trust Conrad Burns a heck of a lot more than their tool
Jon Tester.
Max Baucus says he's done more for Montana than Burns?
Max Baucus
wants a piece of the debate? Start talking the real issues and watch him dance.
[From previous] ..."Conrad Burns 'broke' as we used to say, or 'went off' on fire fighters who he felt hadn't done enough to save some buildings last summer and I would be very interested to hear what he really was thinking about that"...
Maybe Burns is trying to tell you something.

Jon Tester and Ted Kaczynski: CIA Montana.

One of them is running for the United States Senate. I'm not sure it's the right one. Say what you want about the guy; Kaczynski is pretty smart, and could certainly modify his admittedly somewhat extreme environmental positions which, like Tester's organic farming, appear to have been 'CIA-influenced' anyway.

What about the Minute Men, Ruby Ridge, and all the weird crap?
I can't speak to all of it - my only real comment is that Oklahoma City hinged on the Branch Davidians previous and the CIA definitely will endlessly leverage its efforts. Welcome to the world of Jon Tester.

This blog [website] does NOT oppose all Democrats or support all Republicans.
I exactly support Conrad Burns and oppose Jon Tester
without reservation.
Solidly Republican, Suddenly in Doubt; GOP Faces Unlikely Challenges in West, Blaine Harden, Washington Post, October 24 2006 on, among others, Bill Sali of Idaho. I very much like Larry Craig, Senator from Idaho, but it sounds like Bill Sali is out of line with his own people - or that is what the Post would have you believe with a citation to an older female Republican and he only narrowly took the primary. Sali claims there is a link between abortion and breast cancer; doctors do lie without doubt but I trust women who live it more than a politician talking 'on stage.' Lowest abortion rate in the country 2004 was Kentucky with just over 7 abortions per thousand live births, California and New York were high for the states at slightly over thirty per thousand, and District of Columbia was literally off the chart at sixty abortions per thousand live births. You read the paper twice about the public schools here and you'll oppose abortion too; Sali doesn't have to be forcing a link between breast cancer and abortion.
In Calif., Charlie Brown Could Have The Last Laugh, Shailagh Murray, Post Oct 24 2006 on a retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel named Charlie Brown running as a Democrat in California. "Brown lined up precinct captains and courted labor unions and other left-leaning organizations"..... Bull. I worked Chicago construction, and in my recollection the labor movement there might have been broadly populist but it was hardly "left-leaning": Ronald Reagan ran the Screen Actors Guild. You wanting to raise the minimum wage doesn't make you a radical, but this gets specifically back to Jon Tester and the game he is playing in Montana. In California, they looked at the Air Force Colonel's membership in the ACLU and tried to hit him over the head with it, claiming the ACLU defended the North American Man / Boy Love Association which John DeCamp and Noreen Gosch have written about. THAT is definitely the CIA which Jon Tester is linked to - both the pervert Association to begin with AND the ACLU defending it.

You talk to Jon Tester about his CIA affiliation and its possible he'll admit to it, but claim that he hasn't done anything like the corruption of the ACLU or its just talk about the kids or whatever. NO WAY. Do not believe that - they are corrupt to the core, and he is part of it. I very much believe that Roe v. Wade was CIA-orchestrated, with Jane Roe [Norma McCorvey] now reversing to be pro-life after all the trouble its caused - that is Jon Tester and that is the CIA playing both sides of the coin in Montana.
I claim that if Norma McCorvey gets CIA money or support somehow it should be made public because the case was pivotal in American law.
Unibomber. Conrad Burns 'broke' as we used to say, or 'went off' on fire fighters who he felt hadn't done enough to save some buildings last summer and I would be very interested to hear what he really was thinking about that. If something can be orchestrated, the CIA will do it - don't even pause or hesitate.

The larger point is that the CIA is corruption, it is in Montana, and Jon Tester is a BIG part of it as their candidate for the United States Senate.

Deaf kids smell a rat - protests over 'situational dominance' at Gallaudet.

At issue is a 'New World Order' scenario of encroaching on the deaf community 'at its heart' with a 'divide and conquer' strategy represented by an unpopular choice for presidency of the college [scheduled to take office in January]. She can utilize sign language and is 'strong' or forceful in the gestures, but she learned it late in life and kids blow passed her in fluency. It is the only college for the deaf in the United States [and its historic, chartered just after the Civil War or something] and the kids want someone at the top of the game, opposing what is pretty clearly a 'fix' candidate though they probably cannot precisely characterize where the fix is coming from. In turn, she - Jane. K. Fernandes - says that "What we are dealing with on the campus is anarchy and terrorism" and that is just bizarre. It's a bunch of pissed off deaf kids. Sure they're intuitive, but being deaf also has great 'immediacy' - somebody who is deaf is there in it 24/365 - which is hard for an outside force [the CIA or whoever] to erode.

The kids know that once it goes it ain't coming back. There probably are some deaf people in Montana - there may even be or have been a state school for deaf kids - but the larger pattern of activity is what we look at here. The immediate POINT is that the people doing it will flat out lie, deny, or try to diminish what is going on: being patronizing or condescending probably REALLY infuriates that crowd which is good. The public should be so active. What Jon Tester is doing is ultimately contemptuous of the voter and 'democracy' which is wrong. Definitely salute the deaf kids who refuse to be categorized or blinded and aren't putting up with the crap.

Jon Tester CIA.

Conrad Burns is better. Burns is certainly not Agency [he's trying to defend himself from them], and I support Burns.

Tester has a degree in music - my guess is they told him they were going to take his job away [or just went ahead and did it] but offered him an alternative which has turned out to be this deal with the devil. They probably did not say they were going to use him to diminish the principles of democracy or attack the people of Montana - that was a gradual 'evolution of thought' process. There is corruption in conspiracy and insider dealing - Tester will almost certainly admit to that, claiming he educates himself against it and hasn't 'fallen into the rut' though he will admit some Agency people have.

Jon Tester has fallen into the rut and is corrupt in it. Don't believe him when he tries to deny it.

At the same time, its important you don't underestimate them; the CIA is very good at what they do. I ask you oppose Tester. Insist on individual accountability - Tester isn't a young person or ignorant - but you need to oppose all of it. Gay marriage in Massachusetts is CIA and that should eliminate Mitt Romney. It's BOTH parties, but who really cut the deal with Bush to attack Burns and go after Montana. The choices aren't endless.

Hillary Clinton - CIA for sure.

Question: in the late 1990s, was Tester on the radar screen and where do you see something like that? I was litigating against what I eventually realized was a 'CIA Capital Punishment Advocacy' - CIA infiltration of state legislatures as reflected in expansion of capital punishment and near universal adaptation of the 'lethal injection death process.' Uniform intoxication standards and seat belt laws are less dramatic indicators; it is important to understand the CIA will try to control arguments on both sides of any coin. It was never just Tester but they had someone else - at least one other person - as well.

Did Senator [then-First Lady] Clinton meet or know Tester in the late 1990s. I'm not sure, but the CIA will try to leverage assets. My guess is they probably did 'meet', if only obliquely across a room or them flashing her to him in a crowd. At a convention if he was a delegate would be one obvious guess. Christmas card or paper trail - doubtful.
Alternately, it's a long shot but not impossible - Hillary Clinton supposedly laundered drug money through state bond agencies while she worked at the Rose Law Firm in the 1980s, and at some points in time drugs were brought in through Montana. In fact the savings & loan crisis - a CIA funding mechanism - also touched on Montana. There might be a more immediate tie than one would suppose.

Both Clintons will deny all affiliation with the CIA but the evidence is fairly circumstantial. The CIA tried to give weapons to the Contras but the M-16s they had were old and faulty; apparently there was a problem at the bolt face in early models. The Clintons then moved an old and respected weapons manufacturing concern - Iver Johnson - to Arkansas for the rework job. Iver Johnson also continued with their pre-existing product line however, and the only assault rifle I ever owned was manufactured by the CIA under Bill Clinton in Arkansas; .30 caliber carbine with an action that was rougher than a dirt road gone to washboard but I'll say this for it - it was cheap.

What is kind of humorous is that - maybe not in public but if you can get close to him in private - you can ask Ted Kennedy whether or not all of this is true. Instinctively you guess that fact is stranger than fiction, but this is much closer than that even.

From an article in The Weekly Standard, the more-or-less official intellectual weight behind Bush and the so-called conservative values, by Matthew Continetti, associate editor.

On October 17, Tester visited St. Vincent Health Care hospital in Billings, where he ate lunch with a group of doctors. For a hospital dining room, the food didn't seem too healthy: The entrées on offer were chicken fried steak and ham. Tester grabbed a plate and started eating. The conversation was polite. One of the doctors mentioned he once spent a summer in Big Sandy. Tester got excited. They discussed the "big white house" about 30 miles outside of town that the MacNamara ranching family built long ago. Every so often Tester would turn to Sharla and ask her a question.

Then the talk turned serious. The doctors started complaining about malpractice lawsuits. It became clear that these medical professionals felt heavy pressure not only from lawyers sniffing out the next kill but also from government bureaucrats and needy patients. They saw health care not simply in terms of the uninsured, but as a complicated tradeoff involving cost control, access to services, and quality of care. Someone asked Tester what should be done. He clearly had no idea what to say, so he opened the floor to suggestions. After a little more discussion he asked, "So what's the solution?"

"You tell us," one of the doctors replied.

"You guys are in the field," Tester said. "I know how to grease a combine, okay?"

Everyone laughed and smiled, but Tester's smile was the widest of them all.

[So Jon Tester just gave your vote on health care to the CIA, or at best he's kicking around who's responsibility it is - my criticisms in brackets].

Tester is not what you would call a detail-oriented politician. He tends to stick to generalities... He never mentions which specific health care policies he would adopt, saying only that all options should be "on the table." [Has Burns taken options off the table?] He avoids confrontation. As I watched Tester interact with voters, I never heard him ask anyone for their vote.
[Interestingly, that is real Bush CIA. They aren't confrontational beyond the occasional 'false front' - the issue is duplicity. Bush never vetoes but makes conditional].

....When I asked him when he would support the use of military force overseas, he said, "Last resort. You've exhausted all other options, then you use military force." [as opposed to Burns, who is known to be quick to the gun]. He wouldn't say much more. Eventually he added that he supported the war in Afghanistan, "You bet." When I asked him about the Patriot Act, which he has said he would like to see repealed, he softened his language. "We ought not to cut the judicial branch out of it," he said. "If it can't meet constitutional muster, it's got to be scrapped."

[So Jon Tester and Hillary Clinton aren't going to scrap or repeal the so-called Patriot Act because the CIA won't let them; they're going to dance with it when it should be scrapped and I trust Burns a heck of a lot more on that than Tester].

...[T]he nation's most influential liberal blogger, Markos Moulitsas, wrote on his website Daily Kos when Tester won the Democratic primary... people-power matters.
What is clear [ ] is that Moulitsas has done everything he can to champion Tester's candidacy.... [T]he bloggers are attracted to Tester's populism, his antiwar politics, his criticisms of the Patriot Act, and his authenticity [no way is affiliation with the CIA 'authenticity'].

But Moulitsas also believes Tester and other Western Democrats represent the beginning of a new political animal--what he calls the Libertarian Democrat.

In this analysis, traditional libertarians err in seeing the government as the greatest threat to individual freedom.

Corporations also threaten personal liberty, Moulitsas writes on his website and in a recent essay for the Cato Institute.

So the Libertarian Democrat uses government power to limit the freedom-inhibiting tendencies of global capitalism while also guarding against abuses of government power.

"A Libertarian Dem gets that no one is truly free if they fear for their health, so social net programs are important to allow individuals to continue to live happily into their old age," Moulitsas wrote in a June 7 post. "Same with health care. And so on."

My comment: CIA Southwest Airlines is attacking the pensions, health care, and job benefits of every worker in the industry - THAT'S A LIBERTARIAN DEM?!? Tester does not have any special plans - he's just going to rely on the CIA to ride the pony home, trying to modify their plans now and then for the gallery, and they'll throw him some easy scores for good publicity with the folks back home.
READ PLAIN WITH THE BACKGROUND MADE CLEAR: In this analysis, [he says] traditional libertarians err in seeing the CIA MANIPULATION OF government as the greatest threat to individual freedom.
Corporations also threaten personal liberty [but they are increasingly CIA-driven; Hillary Clinton was on the board of Wal-Mart when they were developing their attack strategy, preparing to instigate the Chinese invasion as opposed to splitting China/Brazil or even, heaven forbid, keeping some manufacturing domestic], Moulitsas writes on his website and in a recent essay for the Cato Institute.

CIA plays both sides of the coin.

[T]he Libertarian Democrat uses government power to limit the freedom-inhibiting tendencies of global capitalism WHICH THE CIA INSTIGATED TO BEGIN WITH while also guarding against abuses of government power WHICH THE CIA IS BEHIND.

Democrats don't have special credibility in that.

The one thing they got right - PEOPLE POWER. Yes, better believe Conrad Burns should be reelected, arguing that he is 'people power' as opposed to Tester who is duplicity and CIA.

My fear in writing this blogspot is that it is so totally oriented toward the CIA that readers can overdose on it or even come to treat the issue dismissively. I can point to Dru Sjodin for sure, because everybody of voting age just lived through that huge publicity effort together, but the crimes were in North Dakota and Minnesota rather than Montana [that we know of]. Eastern part of the state and along the Canadian border there has been talk about murders and 'protected corruption' though I cannot point to an absolute example as pristine as Sjodin [at one point I thought I heard 'Harve' mentioned].
What I do know. Chased by the Japanese I went screaming through Montana a couple of times, and I would guess its conceptually possible to 'size' or reverse engineer the CIA presence in Montana off my name in their files or in files of the FBI which the CIA people might reasonably have access to. For exactly that reason they probably won't let you just walk in and read those files but I'll give you a taste of it; there are foreign students at colleges in Montana who have acted in the Asian surveillance mechanism, and bikers susceptible to participation in threat mechanisms.

It is serious, and it is there. Which colleges and when - the immediate problem is that I don't remember. It was a couple times; once to Great Falls and Helena in a loop out of the Idaho panhandle, once to the Custer battlefield at Little Big Horn [I was impressed with the cemetary which also buried vets from subsequent wars] and then a pass heading west down state road in the center of the state after I came up out of Wyoming - that took a couple days [beef rancher was having an auction I was a few weeks early for and couldn't attend but he let me see the stock - I had cash at the time and periodically thought about holding beef if a guy was going in on it with me], the first time I ever went was driving early morning into Butte and you do get the feeling its a little bit of a rough and tumble populist town.

Conrad Burns is the man.
CIA-associated Jon Tester is NOT the man.

George W. Bush teaming with Hillary Clinton to throw the races:
Pressing Senate Bid With Sharp Tongue and Strong Resolve, Marc Santora, New York Times October 20 2006 page A20.
It would be hard to imagine a race with two such strikingly different candidates. Mrs. Clinton has a comfortable suburban upbringing, counted the nation's elite as her peers at Wellesley College and Yale Law School and became the first woman to be made full partner at the Rose Law Firm in Arkansas [ed. - without going into the allegation about laundering drug money through state bond issues].
Mr. Spencer, 59, was an orphan and a community college dropout who enlisted in the Army [in 1966, and by 1968, he was in Vietnam, where he led a combat platoon south of Danang... He is reluctant to talk about his time in battle. But he has no regrets about going. "We were on a mission to help the South Vietnamese people," he said. Mr. Spencer was awarded the Bronze Star for his service.
George Kline, 58, [ ] served under Mr. Spencer's command. "He was never a dictator type," Mr. Kline said. "But he spoke his mind. And he also had a nice dose of healthy sarcasm"].
He [Mr. Spencer] battled and overcame alcoholism, worked in construction, built his own cleaning business and became mayor of Yonkers, New York's fourth-largest city. He governed as a tax cutting, law-and-order conservative....
Yet he is also deeply frustrated by the lack of support he has received from the national Republican Party, despite its deep antipathy toward Mrs. Clinton. He also has received little help from either Gov. George E. Pataki or former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, whom Mr. Spencer has criticized as too liberal.
In a recent interview with the syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak, Mr. Spencer said the lack of support made him feel like he had been

"stabbed in the back."

Him with Burns and Allen. Spencer sounds a heck of a lot better than Clinton to me; heck of a long shot [Yankees throw games so bad its pathetic] but New York could yet come through.

No doubt about it, Bush and the Democrats in conspiracy are doing all sorts of sneaky stuff they shouldn't be doing at the expense of pursuing security matters they should be taking care of.
Report: Security gaps in prison; [ALL EDITIONS]
CAROL EISENBERG. NEWSDAY WASHINGTON BUREAU. Newsday. (Combined editions). Long Island, N.Y.: Oct 4, 2006. pg. A.23
WASHINGTON - A terror suspect may be secretly wiretapped by the U.S. government. But once convicted and sent to prison, he has much less to worry about from Big Brother, according to a new Justice Department report.
Federal prison officials do not read all the letters to and from convicted terrorists.... Nor do officials adequately monitor telephone conversations, cellblock talks or prison visits by family and friends, the report concluded.
"The threat remains that terrorist and other high-risk inmates can use mail and verbal communications to conduct terrorist or criminal activities while incarcerated," it said.
Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn was rated the worst of 10 federal prisons when it came to random monitoring of inmates' mail - reading 0.3 percent of all mail in one given week last year.
... Moreover, media reports last year revealed that three men convicted in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and incarcerated in a federal prison in Florence, Colo., wrote more than 90 letters to Islamic extremists from their prison cells - including more than a dozen to men linked to the March 11, 2004, attacks on Madrid commuter trains. The Madrid attacks killed 191 people and wounded more than 1,700.
"Today's report confirms our worst fears: The Bureau of Prisons continues to be incompetent when it comes to detecting possible terrorist activity in federal prisons," said Sen. Charles Schumer (D- N.Y.), who had asked for the investigation.
"Given past evidence of terrorists communicating with active terror cells from inside prison walls, it is inexcusable that the Bureau of Prisons is not monitoring high-risk prisoners more closely. ... Starting immediately, we need to see much more aggressive ... efforts."

So the Democrats and liberals unleashed the CIA on Montana. Shrewd. Putting their wolves on your sheep. Did the CIA drive Unibomber whether or not their people were out there on the ground. Forces can be working both ways; it seemed harmless and the young guys love the overtime. Fairly compelling talk in Washington D.C. is that Hamas is entirely a Mossad orchestration, and Hezbollah is entirely CIA dating from Richard Helms leaving the Agency for Tehran as Watergate was building in early 1973 [he wanted 'deniability' on forcing Nixon out; the more I read the more I think Nixon was framed though in many respects 'they had his number']. The Mossad runs Hamas via the Israeli prison system - they actually use prisoners as a way to both monitor and control the operations, with some individuals additionally implanted. The CIA has a whole different style in running Hezbollah - what I call 'Vichy collaboration' as opposed to occupation. This has caused conflict between the Israelis and Americans at the top, and tension through the midlevel ranks on a 'trickle down' basis.
The CIA doesn't care to translate the calls and mail even with the Bureau of Prison funding because its peripheral to them, while its central to the Israeli style of management. So the Israelis asked Senator Schumer - Lutheran from Missouri - to get on it and he evidently did; the pack of them - lock, stock, and barrel - is corrupted in it. In a nutshell I guess I would offer that as one example of why they are after Burns who is pretty much clean and want to swap in Tester who is already very much part of that game.

Of course Schumer is from New York. For the most part I don't like the way people's religious beliefs get generalized and don't much go there unless they're conspicuous in it, other than that Lieberman is the Senator representing Israel who is facing a CIA attack in Connecticut by an opponent who can only talk about something close to 270 degrees of the 360 degree circle. Nobody can talk about the last part -Lieberman's support of Israel as problematic - for fear of incurring the wrath of the Jews.
And I actually like Lieberman, at least as opposed to a CIA candidate who is in it with Bush and Clinton, pretty much stratifying society and legitimizing them forcing serfdom on you.

The Homeland Security group in Montana ought to make this required reading.

The larger political picture has Mark Warner stepping down in Virginia for Obama in 2008. The CIA took down a guy named Jack Ryan in Chicago to seat Obama in 2004 which actually has interesting parallels to them taking down John Morrison, and this latest development is not a healthy sign [word must be out that Obama is a 'fix' candidate; The Audacity of Hope I guess]. Beyond opposition to the conspiracy and gaming, Conrad Burns represents the conservative opposition to gun control, while Jon Tester can only offer his opinion, and doesn't have a group in Congress remotely behind him on it which he pretty much admits.

The Organic Myth; Pastoral ideals are getting trampled as organic food goes mass market, Diane Brady, Business Week, October 16 2006 page 51.
"It would be great to get all our food within a 10-mile radius of our house," he says. "But once you're in organic, you have to source globally." Chairman and CEO Gary Hirshberg, Stonyfield Farm ["main facility is a state-of-the-art industrial plant just off the airport strip in Londonderry N.H."].
There simply aren't enough organic cows in the U.S., never mind the organic grain to feed them, to go around...
That's asinine, and may reflect CIA-orchestration in trade or so-called 'globalization' at an overview level [Wal-Mart forming unions in China while hammering workers at home for example] and in food supply and organic foods at an immediate level [Southwest Air attacking wage structure in the airline industry as 'evidenced' by their fuel hedging across 2005 which gets into a long discussion reverse-engineering CIA energy policy for example].
The problem for the people of Montana is that
Jon Tester started out on a school board [not unusual for a politician] which was near immediately then associated with a possible CIA litigation paradigm [bizarre, corrupt, and preclusionary for a politician], most recently going on to take down John Morrison. Hugely ominous, the CIA involvement is increasing rather than decreasing or even leveling. Tester is CIA start-to-finish or A-to-Z, now 'on the gain' or accelerating.

I like Conrad Burns fine, and think he does a good job in the United States Senate for Montana.
1. He IS being attacked by the CIA - no 'maybe' - and I set out to write a blog which would document the attack.

2. I also like some Democrats - Ron Wyden [Or], Tom Carper [Del], Byron Dorgan [ND], and to the best of my knowledge - after some observation - I've concluded they are not behind the attack on Conrad Burns. Instead there seems to be a small power clique in Congress [Hillary Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Hillary Clinton - who used to sit on the board of Wal-Mart] deliberately setting out to topple Burns as part of a larger scheme to take control of the legislative branch from the Republicans. George W. Bush is working with the CIA from the other side to give it away in absolutely shameful ways which disgrace the whole system, but by-in-large the conspiracy is not widespread. In fact its possibly entirely limited to Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush which illustrates the power those two have.
On October 17 2006 I wrote that the people who I consider to be 'regular Democrats' weren't in on the conspiracy to take down Burns. You can say what you want about 'east and west coast liberals,' but Wyden is from Oregon and Carper is from Deleware and they're both normal guys. It's the people from New York and California who racketeer; Hillary Clinton probably doesn't make a lot of moves without telling Dianne Feinstein [Calif] what she's doing.
On October 18 2006 there was a brief indicator to the effect somebody's staffers are running around Capital Hill in Washington D.C. trying to arrange some strong anti-Burns sentiment among the regular Democrats. I say it can't be done without empowering a CIA threat mechanism which is perfectly capable of turning and biting the hand holding the leash as we see here in Abramoff.

Both parties caucus on Tuesdays, and in the weeks before the end of the session there was an effort made to FORCE BUSH OUT. A pattern of hospitalizations suggests he radiated and essentially murdered William Rehnquist, then-Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, in 2004 and May/June/July 2005 though we have no idea what the impeachment paper would actually say or whether the Senators would just threaten to go public with that on television.
Forget about the war in Iraq - the presidency is meant to be a powerful position which the party out of office always accuses the seated party of abusing. For sure Bush violated the Constitution in the attacks on Rehnquist though, and now we see him coming the other way in attacking Senator Burns [if you're going to violate the Constitution, really trample it and get some kicks in][the Clintons ran the CIA during the mobilization period prior to the attack on Burns, but Bush apparently kicked off the operational activity to actually take him down]. End of the day the Senators are going to be sorry they didn't throw him out when they were in caucus on it. Who obstructed the effort - my guess is that on the Democrat's side it was Senator Clinton, and on the Republican side it was people like Saxby Chambliss and Senator Cornyn.

3. This blog discusses the context of the attack on Burns, and tries to provide concepts and nomenclature for public use in discussion and debate; the ultimate CONCLUSION, however, is that the Democrats do not have a candidate opposing Burns.
In Jon Tester they have naught but a CIA-characterized orchestration which will never be able to serve the State of Montana, at least in part because that's what Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush wanted. Dating Tester to the late 1990s I cannot help but see him as a Hillary Clinton construction; this is actually a classic case and I'd put his picture next to her name in the dictionary.

You're welcome to read on.

CIA trying to 'assume virtue' in mass media.

You can double click on the images to expand them, and wait for an icon to appear at the bottom to expand them again, but I wrote the important part here.New Law Cripples Internet Gambling, Banks Are Barred From Handling Transactions, Frank Ahrens, Washington Post, October 14 2006 page 1. The bill's sponsor, Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte (R-Va.)[if not "affiliated with" certainly proximate to the CIA attack on George Allen], said he opposes all gambling, citing its "ill effects on society," but particularly Internet gambling, which led him to draft the legislation in the summer. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn) attached Goodlatte's bill to the port-security measure to ensure its passage and Bush's signature....

Please DO NOT vote for Bill Frist in any presidential campaign. We don't support gambling either, but what they're trying to do with this is preserve a 'CIA-exclusive franchise and revenue mechanism' which evades legislative oversight. Literally ‘enforcement of the CIA gambling franchise’ continuing in the paper 10/14/06 as in the ongoing attack on Conrad Burns. Is that concrete evidence they cheated with Tester to knock out John Morrison – no, but it indicates the attack is pervasive to the point they weren’t going to leave it to chance and the last minute.

Does Jon Tester opposed gambling, including at the Indian casinos? If he does he should say so.

The CIA activity is not hard to find once you know what you’re looking for. Frist, Hastert, Santorum [R-Pa, who, with DeLay greatly expanded the number of lobbyists in Washington commensurate to preserving the Bush Administration’s expansion of government] – there definitely are bad Republicans here who deserve to be removed from Congress. Without doubt. The PROBLEM is that the CIA is conspiring to PRESERVE the bad Republicans in place and ELIMINATE the good ones like Burns who they pretty clearly recognize as a thorn in their side, attempting to replace him with a ‘pick’ candidate they’ve been grooming for years going back at least to the school board days which we’ll look at.

Keep your eye on the ball – it ain’t the ‘party affiliation’ which is important or a mark of integrity one way or the other. Its the man. Please continue to support Conrad Burns.
Rep. Robert W. Goodlatte (R-Va.)may not be "affiliated with" the CIA attack on George Allen in Virginia but he's certainly proximate to it and was writing the legislation right around the time the CIA-orchestrated controversy down there blew up. It isn't Burns in particular or limited to specific issues; they just want the guys 'who won't go their way' OUT and out now.
FASCINATING INSIGHT: In both these cases - Burns and Allen - the Senators typically don't just roll over for them but this time did 'what they thought the CIA wanted' because it seemed relatively trivial and compared to what the CIA usually does they figured nobody was going to get hurt. 'Macaca' - Allen did say that but only because he figured that him taking a few punches in media was better than the CIA causing a child to die of exposure in a border crossing which they have been known to do. Now its 'CIA-high school' - they're like a bunch of little kids trying to combine and attack the adults. Petulant.

Jon Tester was in on taking down John Morrison dirty and then stealing his ideas.

By blogswarm bio. The embattled 2006 U.S. senate campaign of Montana State Auditor John Morrison was dealt a devasting blow with the latest revelations about his conduct. When the ethics scandal broke the initial focus was on the political implications, but there is now a growing emphasis on the ethics.
The Billings Gazette's scoop two weeks ago included the following: Morrison also acknowledged that he gave Harding $1,000 during their brief relationship in 1998, describing it as a loan [...] She said the money was a gift from Morrison, not a loan. When candidates file to run for statewide office in Montana, they file a Form D-1 disclosing "an interest that currently is valued at $1,000 or more." So if it was a loan, it should have been disclosed......

In other words, had Morrison given the woman $950 or even $999 we'd be talking a whole different picture. What a bunch of swine. That blogger [writer] may have been CIA orchestrated.

This is John Morrison. As part of a 'CIA persona' whether or not he means it [it was part of what made him attractive to them whether or not he initiated it], Jon Tester apparently feels driving a pickup truck in Washington D.C. would help improve life in Montana. It won't, beyond the CIA's inclination to open the spigot or shut it. Point blank Morrison would have been the better man of the two of them; the Senate has a rigid dress code and Conrad Burns is an expert in taking that 'western attitude' exactly as far as he can without opening the door to people diminishing the concept or reducing Montana because of it. Understanding the inclination, be aware the party structure significantly 'channels' attempted lateral movement and the bureaucracy will fight it; Senator Burns has that down cold - the inside game is his - and is there is no further gain for Montana in trying to erode 'the establishment' here.

My name is Andy Bestor, I live in Washington D.C. - actually I got chased here by the Japanese which was kind of like running to first base and then standing on it in baseball, and - with the vultures circling - I pretty much make it my business to work with whoever you send. In 1996 I was at the Western Writers convention in Albuquerque New Mexico with some people from Montana who might vaguely recall the situation.
I like Senator Burns fine, but could go the other way just as well.
The IMMEDIATE PROBLEM is that Burns is being attacked by the CIA, and it is critically important you understand two things:

1. 'Burns being attacked'
is part of a longer range CIA effort
which includes BOTH specifically targeting Montana AND maintaining control of 'the CIA gambling franchise' which we are discovering to be a CIA funding mechanism effectively beyond legislative oversight. What I am bitter about - before you get carried away in Mike Mansfield stories, be sure to note those guys laid the ground work for a lot of problems that have been the devil to reign in.
2. This is a 'winnable' fight.
Bizarre and unfortunate, the CIA attacked Connecticut and New Jersey in the Summer of 2004. George Tenet, director of the CIA, stepped down in June, the governor of New Jersey was knocked down in July, the governor of Connecticut was knocked down in August, and Porter Goss was sworn in as the new director of the CIA in September - conceptually keeping their hands clean. Jon Corzine, who was in the United States Senate, then went to bat for New Jersey and in turn knocked down Richard Codey, the CIA Vichy collaborator.
It can be done.
Of course the fight continues: NOW they're going after New Jersey again, and very possibly will attempt VOTER FRAUD at the polls.

That - 'voter fraud at the polls' - is the single thing which worries me most about Montana. Virtually any drop off in voting [a low turn out] is going to make it easier for them to cheat, they will cheat [they will immediate float 'poll figures' in media showing this to be 'pre-ordained'], and it is almost hard to blame the poll officials for it - of course they're obligated not to cheat, but they were up against the CIA [definite - without question] with one hand tied behind their back to the extent this isn't something that's easy to talk about.
And talking about it might have gotten them in trouble. A car accident. That is not what you teach children about democracy - its important to vote because the other guy is gaming with the CIA on a long term basis and you're trying to diminish his ability to manipulate the system as well as trying to support the honest poll officials; cry beloved country but its true.

Did they cheat at the polls in knocking down Morrison - if there was cheating it was leveraged a number of different ways:
knocking down Morrison,
as a rehearsal for attacking Burns,
to extend their ties into various communities and levels of state government,
and ultimately as a way of asserting 'situational dominance' which is a whole topic of its own.

Morrison - aside from the one infidelity - looked good to me and quite frankly there are people in Washington D.C. with more than the one strike against them; why didn't the CIA go with him instead of Tester to begin with?
No idea. My best guess is that his father was apparently a Supreme Court justice in Montana and perhaps couldn't be corrupted in their gaming.

The 'blog excerpt' printed above was very possibly CIA-originated. Problem for Burns is that to fight he probably will have to bring some outside people in, and Tester is going to try to use that against him.

What else about Tester?
The CIA in organic farming - in fact, the CIA in anything related to food supply including bio-engineered wheat and chemicals in soft drinks [certain],
the CIA in the effort to de-populate the great plains states [certain],
the CIA in a possible 'Havre-specific' construction [there isn't always fire where there's smoke but it pays to be aware of the situation],
and 'big music' generally ever since the Miles Copeland CIA Police controversy, which is definitely going to be a worry with Pearl Jam.

Jon Tester served on a school board that immediately got hit with a bunch of lawsuits. One was initiated by the ACLU. Unfortunately, to my great regret -
and Conrad Burns never plays games with "the L word" or any of that crap attacking liberals at least in Washington because that won't help him when he pulls for Montana -
the ACLU is significantly in bed with the CIA. I was jumped by the Japanese when I worked construction in Tokyo 1994~1995; I took off on the run and they've chased me across two oceans and three continents for now over a decade of close interaction also with American elements, and the most CIA people I've ever seen in one spot was on the steps of the Supreme Court building trying to covertly influence judicial process in the
United States. If Tester is in bed with that - as it very much appears he is - that should be preclusionary.

Is the CIA in the Montana State House - they're in forty nine others. Was Tester somebody they went to if not their 'focal' or local agent? Don't know for sure but it was him or somebody else.

George Tenet and Conrad Burns - once they were on speaking terms if not friends.

The CIA will not work just one side of the coin. Lock on it. Where they work, they definitely work both sides of the coin, and that is the scary thing the people of Montana are immediately confronted with.

I don't like Tester being in organic farming when other farmers apparently 'aren't quite cutting it' or aren't able to qualify for the certification when it looks like 'certification' may reflect a CIA selectivity characteristic rather than finite criteria. Does everybody have the same chance at the market, or do other people's deals seem to always 'fall apart at the last minute.' You want to talk about 'corruption or the appearance of corruption,' be sure to start right there.

I grew up in dairy. If you messed up and soap got in the milk tank they can send a special truck - or the truck could make a special run for it. Later on in Chicago construction I had a boss who was allergic to wheat, and I definitely understand why you want to keep the grains separate when you harvest. It probably is a 'best practice' to document cleaning your cutter and rigs anyway, and in a 'high end' market that isn't unreasonable.
Open secret Washington D.C. - people here think the CIA was behind the
E. coli spinach contamination in California. In nature it probably isn't a problem, but farmers should understand the CIA would delight in contaminating your harvestors with some incredibly persistant strain of wheat mold infection they manufactured in a lab but pretend came from China.
More immediately, plant products are used in drug manufacturing - what do farmers do when they harvest for a drug company? Bet there are damn tight restrictions. At some point, however, if the measures get draconian rather than productive in maintaining quality control there's a pretty good chance somebody is gaming in the market.
A long term survey of organic food supplies might reveal a surprising degree of CIA involvement for a number of reasons and at a number of levels; there is a 'culture' associated with organic food that is probably very vulnerable to corruption. Ironically, Tester's involvement in organic farming 'figuring into the attack on Burns' makes me think that whole market is something Burns should investigate, though obviously he can't do it now until after the election or he's going to be accused of attacking his opponent for political gain.

And Tester can't both be in bed with the CIA on that and be arguing he's trying to correct the de-population of the plains states. BOGUS.

My apparently unique problem with the Clinton Administration. They had ADM. They owned ADM on a corruption bust, and my guess is that if the FBI hadn't acted fast with a walk in informer the CIA probably would have moved to shut that down but anyway they had ADM.
Anywhere else in the world, you go to your boss with something like that and they'll damn sure ask about the other 50% of the market. If you have ADM, what about Cargill?
Clinton wouldn't do it.
Please note I do not argue to put those guys out of business - they handle everything up to and including cocoa in Africa which probably serves to capitalize those markets. At the same time, the government is trying to subsidize the farmer and not the investor, there are issues in bio-engineered food supplies which need to be addressed, and a CIA guy named Allard Lowenstein essentially broke Rhodesia with a dictator named Mugabe - turning the 'bread basket of Africa' into the dust of Zimbabwe. The issues are bigger than one individual and they have an impact far from Montana but the fight is where you find it.
The CIA is attacking Conrad Burns and he will fight - in fact he has fought and is only upset by the extent to which he previously thought 'supporting them' was a positive step to take in advancing American values,
while Jon Tester has pretty evidently sold out in it and and if you 'share awareness' and ask him hard questions he probably doesn't make any bones about it.
It is important the markets be clean; grain is traded in Chicago but what about organic? I like oates as opposed to wheat and would welcome literally 'an organic oat' market - you want the growers to be certified; fine, so long as it isn't by the CIA. Quaker should not have a lock on the shelf by my refrigerator. There is no 'silver lining' to being attacked by the CIA, but really a number of reform issues are represented by Tester [unfortunately in corruption] and hopefully this will lead to greater inquiry.

With that as our introduction:

Conrad Burns is a seated United States Senator being attacked by the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA], if not immediately 'at the behest of the Bush Administration' than with the knowledge and implicit permission of the Bush Administration. I argue that is wrong, seek to educate the public in the nature of the attack, and ultimately hope to force the CIA into absolute total compliance with the letter of the law in Title 50 Section 401 et seq. [including NO domestic activities], which is one of the bodies of law conceptually restricting the activities of the CIA and protecting the American people.

This is not a long story to tell.

Allen Dulles, Meyer Lansky, Jimmy Hoffa, Kirk Kerkorian - the latter pictured on a construction site in Vegas. Essentially, the CIA set up a funding mechanism evading legislative oversight by working with the Mafia to utilize union pension funds in developing Las Vegas FROM THE 1940s, arguably starting before the CIA was even chartered.
CIA orchestration pre-CIA, as was the Tuskegee syphilis experiment which President Clinton apologized for but certainly never explained.

Ultimately the casinos and hotels in Vegas were migrated from overt Mafia control to corporate structures which increased the dollar value of the CIA revenue stream if not the value of their property holdings in Vegas.

Bidders to Borrow Against Harrah's Real Estate, Dennis K.Berman with Christina Binkley and Peter Sanders, Wall Street Journal Oct. 7-8, 2006. Apollo Management and Texas Pacific Group have assembled five banks - and potentially one more to back their plan to take over the country's largest gambling concern....[discusses the commercial mortgage backed securities market or CMBS which actually backs into CIA involvment in real estate, then noting] "Harrah's 15 billion market capitalization and $11 billion in existing debt."
Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., Deutsche Bank AG [interesting tie in potential expansion of the CIA franchise], JP Morgan Chase & Co., Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. - and potentially Credit Suisse Group - all are participating in the lending, and the terms leave room for a raised bid....
Scary to the extent that's essentially CIA driven.

Kirk Kerkorian is still a player, emerging to attack the United Auto Workers at General Motors, but that only became clear recently - 2005/2006 - after Jack Abramoff had moved forward in either expanding or at least preserving the 'CIA gambling franchise' with the Indian tribes.

The union pension funds no longer drive the development of Las Vegas but the revenue stream endures - a guess is that Senator Burns thought it was a great thing for the Indians 'to have a piece of' and leapt at the opportunity to bring them in, with visions of everything from computers in schools to rehab clinics and bison management programs dancing in his head. 'Indians' and 'casinos' did not intuitively link in early 20th Century American history - a second guess is that the CIA brought the gambling to the Indians [in the late 1970s or 1980s] to begin with.

In fairness to the man, it should also be noted the CIA or anyway Abramoff apparently approached Senator Burns relatively immediately in the 'post-9/11 environment' when everybody was particularly vulnerable to patriotic yearnings however idiotic. Burns was originally elected in 1988. NOW it is becoming very evident Bush is working toward some 'New World Order' scheme immediately visible in shootings at middle and high schools, the CIA is not to be trusted, and while the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the longer-term attack on Burns MAY TURN OUT TO IN FACT BE RELATED nobody remotely had any sense of that at the time.

Could the Abramoff involvment perhaps mean the Jewish community or Israelis are getting a piece of the Indian gambling revenue stream - or want a piece of it,
and view[ed] Senator Burns as an obstacle[?]. Be very careful here; 'not voting for Burns' may invoke the law of unintended consequences.
Senator Clinton is running essentially unopposed in New York which has a strong Jewish community, and a source recently brought word of emergent Jewish ties to the LDS Church in Salt Lake City.

"You don't want me to stab him with that kitchen knife."
"No. You just set him up, punch him all you can, and maybe break some furniture over his head. We'll get the Indian tribes to actually cut him and make him bleed pain; we'll go to them ahead of time and work that out because they're in the deal anyway. Don't be ridiculous - we're much more professional than that."

The CIA attack upon the United Auto Workers now being undertaken by Kirk Kerkorian could arguably be seen as funny to the extent that particular union was notorious as a funding source for Allard Lowenstein and a host of liberal advocacies within the CIA, but of course it isn't really funny. There is larger pain involved. Some Indian casinos go out of business, and some cause fights within the community.
Senator Burns has always been a strong voice for open government and pragmatic solutions in the face of what Reagan called "the fetish of complexity" which characterizes Washington D.C.,
NOW I am hoping he'll come roaring back, looking to significantly expose the CIA manipulation and restrict the Agency to the letter of the Title 50 statutes, but nobody - not his opponent and not the other party - remotely proposed that before.

Part of the problem is that the other party can't act to the extent they're involved in CIA activity at an executive and even managerial level, hoping but doubting Senator Clinton will completely detail her involvement in CIA matters for public consideration well ahead of any presidential candidacy. On the Republican side, Senator McCain may also be tied in the reciprocity concept.

Having walked you through the whole sequence I can say now what you would not have understood at the beginning. Tester is closer to George Bush than Conrad Burns is, and I don't like Bush because he's racketeering and he's sanctimonious in his racketeering. They should make it overt, though nobody in either party has which leaves us with a 'warped democracy': Jon Tester will deny being as close to Bush as he is, and Burns is getting real thin on it but he probably can't acknowledge being as mad about the CIA attack as he really is.

Obviously I totally oppose Jon Tester in Montana over the CIA affiliation. The one 'partisan' or larger insight I can offer from Washington D.C. - Tester claims to support gun ownership and in fairness to him he individually probably does, but the Democrats generally do not and the CIA actively campaigns for restrictions on gun ownership. School shootings, including the Amish school shooting which actually touched a lot of bases for them.
What is it like being a critic of the CIA in Washington D.C.? - I recently spent a lot of time litigating against the CIA 'Capital Punishment Advocacy' [their sneak moves bringing the death penalty into Connecticut, the Dakotas, and Vermont] and opposed the 'murder of infants trapped in car seats' across the summer of 2005.
A 'structural' problem the Democrats face is that they end up naturally backing the CIA [mandating car seats] while Republicans tend to oppose the CIA or at least their invidious activities. The man I feel sorry for, beyond being outraged by the attack on Senator Burns, is Howard Dean who is well intended in trying to [re]establish a fifty state party; the fear is that he's opening the door to a lot of CIA activity. Butte has a progressive tradition and I wouldn't deny that - I prize that. Supporting Conrad Burns right here and now is definitely not shutting any doors in 2008, but your immediate awareness and efforts for Montana are very much appreciated.

Please make the efforts.

Thank you.